PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
V3PB.L vs. VAPX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

V3PB.L vs. VAPX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (V3PB.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, V3PB.L achieves a 31.98% return, which is significantly lower than VAPX.L's 49.68% return.


V3PB.L

1D
0.00%
1M
5.82%
YTD
31.98%
6M
33.49%
1Y
54.96%
3Y*
21.34%
5Y*
10Y*

VAPX.L

1D
1.35%
1M
6.32%
YTD
49.68%
6M
51.93%
1Y
79.09%
3Y*
26.72%
5Y*
12.97%
10Y*
12.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

V3PB.L vs. VAPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
V3PB.L
Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
31.98%21.87%3.24%8.19%-6.18%
VAPX.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing
49.68%31.34%-3.50%3.89%5.97%

Correlation

The correlation between V3PB.L and VAPX.L is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2022

0.77

The correlation between V3PB.L and VAPX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

V3PB.L vs. VAPX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

V3PB.L
V3PB.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
V3PB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V3PB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
V3PB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
V3PB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
V3PB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

VAPX.L
VAPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VAPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

V3PB.L vs. VAPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (V3PB.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


V3PB.LVAPX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.63

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.62

5.87

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.17

20.46

-4.29

V3PB.L vs. VAPX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current V3PB.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the VAPX.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of V3PB.L and VAPX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

V3PB.L vs. VAPX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum V3PB.L drawdown since its inception was -15.03%, smaller than the maximum VAPX.L drawdown of -30.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V3PB.L and VAPX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


V3PB.LVAPX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.03%

-30.88%

+15.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.95%

-13.41%

+1.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.03%

-16.81%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.02%

-5.87%

+0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.38%

-6.30%

+2.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.41%

3.85%

-0.44%

Volatility

V3PB.L vs. VAPX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (V3PB.L) is 9.09%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) has a volatility of 12.74%. This indicates that V3PB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VAPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


V3PB.LVAPX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.09%

12.74%

-3.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.53%

21.18%

-3.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.83%

23.12%

-3.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.43%

16.78%

-0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.43%

17.70%

-1.27%

V3PB.L vs. VAPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

V3PB.L has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than VAPX.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

V3PB.L vs. VAPX.L - Dividend Comparison

V3PB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VAPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
V3PB.L
Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VAPX.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing
1.85%2.70%3.47%3.53%4.32%3.51%2.08%3.39%3.52%3.10%2.71%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


V3PB.L and VAPX.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VAPX.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VAPX.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for V3PB.L.

V3PB.L tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Choice Index, while VAPX.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for V3PB.L and 0.15% for VAPX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for V3PB.L and VAPX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer