PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
V3PB.L vs. PAXJ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

V3PB.L vs. PAXJ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (V3PB.L) and Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF (PAXJ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

V3PB.L is traded in GBP, while PAXJ.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PAXJ.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, V3PB.L achieves a 30.39% return, which is significantly higher than PAXJ.L's 9.14% return.


V3PB.L

1D
-2.23%
1M
10.60%
YTD
30.39%
6M
32.51%
1Y
54.32%
3Y*
19.25%
5Y*
10Y*

PAXJ.L

1D
-0.86%
1M
0.41%
YTD
9.14%
6M
10.33%
1Y
19.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

V3PB.L vs. PAXJ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between V3PB.L and PAXJ.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.31

The correlation between V3PB.L and PAXJ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

V3PB.L vs. PAXJ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

V3PB.L
V3PB.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
V3PB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V3PB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
V3PB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
V3PB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
V3PB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

PAXJ.L
PAXJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
PAXJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAXJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAXJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
PAXJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAXJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

V3PB.L vs. PAXJ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (V3PB.L) and Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF (PAXJ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


V3PB.LPAXJ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.42

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.52

4.99

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.28

12.84

+3.44

V3PB.L vs. PAXJ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current V3PB.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is comparable to the PAXJ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of V3PB.L and PAXJ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


V3PB.LPAXJ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.00

2.37

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

1.70

-0.75

Drawdowns

V3PB.L vs. PAXJ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum V3PB.L drawdown since its inception was -15.03%, smaller than the maximum PAXJ.L drawdown of -17.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V3PB.L and PAXJ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


V3PB.LPAXJ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.03%

-17.40%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.95%

-7.11%

-4.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.23%

-2.85%

+0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.40%

-2.59%

-0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

Volatility

V3PB.L vs. PAXJ.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (V3PB.L) has a higher volatility of 7.65% compared to Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF (PAXJ.L) at 4.28%. This indicates that V3PB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAXJ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


V3PB.LPAXJ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.65%

4.28%

+3.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.68%

10.08%

+5.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.00%

15.02%

+2.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.95%

24.15%

-8.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.95%

24.15%

-8.20%

V3PB.L vs. PAXJ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

V3PB.L has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than PAXJ.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

V3PB.L vs. PAXJ.L - Dividend Comparison

V3PB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PAXJ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%.


Frequently Asked Questions


V3PB.L and PAXJ.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PAXJ.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PAXJ.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for V3PB.L.

V3PB.L tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Choice Index, while PAXJ.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for V3PB.L and 0.12% for PAXJ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for V3PB.L and PAXJ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer