V3PB.L vs. EMAS.L

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

V3PB.L (Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and EMAS.L (SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - V3PB.L tracks the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Choice Index while EMAS.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, V3PB.L returned 21.34%/yr vs 35.88%/yr for EMAS.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. V3PB.L charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for EMAS.L.

Performance

V3PB.L vs. EMAS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (V3PB.L) and SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (EMAS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, V3PB.L achieves a 31.98% return, which is significantly lower than EMAS.L's 81.22% return.

V3PB.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 5.82%
• YTD: 31.98%
• 6M: 33.49%
• 1Y: 54.96%
• 3Y*: 21.34%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMAS.L

• 1D: 38.71%
• 1M: 44.55%
• YTD: 81.22%
• 6M: 83.42%
• 1Y: 109.79%
• 3Y*: 35.88%
• 5Y*: 15.70%
• 10Y*: 15.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

V3PB.L vs. EMAS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
V3PB.L Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	31.98%	21.87%	3.24%	8.19%	-6.18%
EMAS.L SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF	81.22%	22.99%	12.86%	0.62%	3.04%

Correlation

The correlation between V3PB.L and EMAS.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2022	0.62

The correlation between V3PB.L and EMAS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

V3PB.L vs. EMAS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

V3PB.L

V3PB.L Risk / Return Rank: 90
V3PB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
V3PB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
V3PB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 91
V3PB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
V3PB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 87

EMAS.L

EMAS.L Risk / Return Rank: 97
EMAS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
EMAS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
EMAS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 98
EMAS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
EMAS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

V3PB.L vs. EMAS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (V3PB.L) and SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (EMAS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	V3PB.L	EMAS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.79	2.85	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.57	7.46	-3.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	2.09	-0.57
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.62	10.86	-6.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.17	35.46	-19.29

V3PB.L vs. EMAS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current V3PB.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the EMAS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of V3PB.L and EMAS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

V3PB.L vs. EMAS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum V3PB.L drawdown since its inception was -15.03%, smaller than the maximum EMAS.L drawdown of -53.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V3PB.L and EMAS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	V3PB.L	EMAS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.03%	-53.67%	+38.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.95%	-11.14%	-0.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.03%	-25.14%	+10.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.16%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.02%	0.00%	-5.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.38%	-22.16%	+18.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.41%	3.42%	-0.01%

Volatility

V3PB.L vs. EMAS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (V3PB.L) is 9.09%, while SPDR MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (EMAS.L) has a volatility of 33.13%. This indicates that V3PB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMAS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	V3PB.L	EMAS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.09%	33.13%	-24.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.53%	35.89%	-18.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.83%	42.41%	-22.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.43%	28.52%	-12.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.43%	24.30%	-7.87%

V3PB.L vs. EMAS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

V3PB.L has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than EMAS.L's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

V3PB.L vs. EMAS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither V3PB.L nor EMAS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both V3PB.L and EMAS.L in my portfolio?

V3PB.L and EMAS.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, V3PB.L or EMAS.L?

On fees, V3PB.L is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, V3PB.L or EMAS.L?

V3PB.L is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EMAS.L.

What is the main difference between V3PB.L and EMAS.L?

V3PB.L tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Choice Index, while EMAS.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for V3PB.L and 0.55% for EMAS.L.