V3PB.L vs. C300.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

V3PB.L (Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and C300.L (Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - V3PB.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Choice Index, while C300.L is a China Equities fund tracking the S&P China A 300 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, V3PB.L returned 19.76%/yr vs 14.63%/yr for C300.L. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. V3PB.L charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for C300.L.

Performance

V3PB.L vs. C300.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (V3PB.L) and Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C300.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

V3PB.L is traded in GBP, while C300.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the C300.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, V3PB.L achieves a 28.26% return, which is significantly higher than C300.L's 12.87% return.

V3PB.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -3.39%
• 6M: 23.25%
• YTD: 28.26%
• 1Y: 48.20%
• 3Y*: 19.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

C300.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.63%
• 6M: 9.76%
• YTD: 12.87%
• 1Y: 38.18%
• 3Y*: 14.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

V3PB.L vs. C300.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
V3PB.L Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	28.26%	21.87%	3.24%	8.19%	-6.18%
C300.L Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc	12.87%	24.25%	16.79%	-16.21%	-0.70%

Correlation

The correlation between V3PB.L and C300.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2022	0.31

The correlation between V3PB.L and C300.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (3 years) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

V3PB.L vs. C300.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

V3PB.L

V3PB.L Risk / Return Rank: 85
V3PB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
V3PB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
V3PB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
V3PB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
V3PB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 82

C300.L

C300.L Risk / Return Rank: 81
C300.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
C300.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
C300.L Omega Ratio Rank: 72
C300.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
C300.L Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

V3PB.L vs. C300.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (V3PB.L) and Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C300.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	V3PB.L	C300.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	1.95	+0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	2.64	+0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.34	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.05	4.64	-0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.77	14.17	-1.40

V3PB.L vs. C300.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current V3PB.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the C300.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of V3PB.L and C300.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

V3PB.L vs. C300.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum V3PB.L drawdown since its inception was -15.03%, smaller than the maximum C300.L drawdown of -34.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V3PB.L and C300.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	V3PB.L	C300.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.03%	-34.94%	+19.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.95%	-8.28%	-3.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.03%	-26.04%	+11.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.70%	-5.87%	-1.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.43%	-15.09%	+11.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.79%	2.70%	+1.09%

Volatility

V3PB.L vs. C300.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (V3PB.L) has a higher volatility of 10.62% compared to Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C300.L) at 9.20%. This indicates that V3PB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than C300.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	V3PB.L	C300.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.62%	9.20%	+1.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.23%	15.16%	+4.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.46%	19.70%	+1.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.86%	21.48%	-4.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.86%	21.48%	-4.62%

V3PB.L vs. C300.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

V3PB.L has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than C300.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

V3PB.L vs. C300.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither V3PB.L nor C300.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both V3PB.L and C300.L in my portfolio?

V3PB.L and C300.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, V3PB.L or C300.L?

On fees, V3PB.L is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, V3PB.L or C300.L?

V3PB.L is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for C300.L.

What is the main difference between V3PB.L and C300.L?

V3PB.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while C300.L is China Equities. V3PB.L tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Choice Index, while C300.L tracks S&P China A 300 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for V3PB.L and 0.35% for C300.L.