PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
V3MA.DE vs. AE5A.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

V3MA.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG Emerging Markets All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3MA.DE) and Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist (AE5A.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, V3MA.DE achieves a 16.20% return, which is significantly lower than AE5A.DE's 27.41% return.


V3MA.DE

1D
-0.58%
1M
3.08%
YTD
16.20%
6M
17.26%
1Y
31.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AE5A.DE

1D
-1.54%
1M
6.05%
YTD
27.41%
6M
29.44%
1Y
49.88%
3Y*
20.90%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
9.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

V3MA.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between V3MA.DE and AE5A.DE is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2024

0.92

The correlation between V3MA.DE and AE5A.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

V3MA.DE vs. AE5A.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

V3MA.DE
V3MA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
V3MA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V3MA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
V3MA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
V3MA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
V3MA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

AE5A.DE
AE5A.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
AE5A.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AE5A.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
AE5A.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AE5A.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AE5A.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

V3MA.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG Emerging Markets All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3MA.DE) and Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist (AE5A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


V3MA.DEAE5A.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.50

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

4.80

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.63

17.35

-5.72

V3MA.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current V3MA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the AE5A.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of V3MA.DE and AE5A.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


V3MA.DEAE5A.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

2.79

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.42

+0.71

Drawdowns

V3MA.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum V3MA.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.79%, smaller than the maximum AE5A.DE drawdown of -36.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V3MA.DE and AE5A.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


V3MA.DEAE5A.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.79%

-36.16%

+16.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.00%

-10.34%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-2.56%

+1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.29%

-9.72%

+6.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.87%

-0.19%

Volatility

V3MA.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard ESG Emerging Markets All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3MA.DE) is 5.43%, while Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist (AE5A.DE) has a volatility of 7.32%. This indicates that V3MA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AE5A.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


V3MA.DEAE5A.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.43%

7.32%

-1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.23%

14.97%

-2.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.26%

17.82%

-2.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.83%

17.23%

-0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.83%

19.05%

-2.22%

V3MA.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

V3MA.DE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than AE5A.DE's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

V3MA.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Dividend Comparison

V3MA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AE5A.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AE5A.DE
Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist
1.69%2.15%3.38%3.80%2.44%1.62%1.71%2.01%2.17%
V3MA.DE
Vanguard ESG Emerging Markets All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, V3MA.DE and AE5A.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, AE5A.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AE5A.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for V3MA.DE.

V3MA.DE tracks FTSE Emerging All Cap Choice, while AE5A.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for V3MA.DE and 0.14% for AE5A.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for V3MA.DE and AE5A.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer