V3GS.L vs. VHVG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

V3GS.L (Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating) and VHVG.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - V3GS.L is a Global Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR Hdg GBP, while VHVG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, V3GS.L returned 0.46%/yr vs 13.30%/yr for VHVG.L. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. V3GS.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for VHVG.L.

Performance

V3GS.L vs. VHVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (V3GS.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, V3GS.L achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly lower than VHVG.L's 11.81% return.

V3GS.L

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 0.84%
• YTD: 0.62%
• 6M: 0.78%
• 1Y: 4.39%
• 3Y*: 5.34%
• 5Y*: 0.46%
• 10Y*: —

VHVG.L

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 5.52%
• YTD: 11.81%
• 6M: 12.27%
• 1Y: 29.87%
• 3Y*: 18.37%
• 5Y*: 13.30%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

V3GS.L vs. VHVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
V3GS.L Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating	0.62%	6.49%	3.15%	7.67%	-14.59%	1.06%
VHVG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc	11.81%	13.85%	19.99%	17.54%	-8.66%	14.54%

Correlation

The correlation between V3GS.L and VHVG.L is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021	0.16

The correlation between V3GS.L and VHVG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (5 years) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

V3GS.L vs. VHVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

V3GS.L

V3GS.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
V3GS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
V3GS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
V3GS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 31
V3GS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
V3GS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 37

VHVG.L

VHVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
VHVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
VHVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
VHVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
VHVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
VHVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

V3GS.L vs. VHVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (V3GS.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	V3GS.L	VHVG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	2.90	-1.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.65	3.99	-2.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.55	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.67	4.29	-2.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.58	17.65	-12.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

V3GS.L vs. VHVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current V3GS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the VHVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of V3GS.L and VHVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	V3GS.L	VHVG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.14	2.90	-1.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08	1.03	-0.94
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.10	0.89	-0.79

Drawdowns

V3GS.L vs. VHVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum V3GS.L drawdown since its inception was -20.17%, smaller than the maximum VHVG.L drawdown of -25.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V3GS.L and VHVG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	V3GS.L	VHVG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.17%	-25.41%	+5.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.61%	-6.94%	+4.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.80%	-17.96%	+14.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.17%	-17.96%	-2.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.61%	-0.36%	-0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.82%	-3.28%	-4.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.78%	1.69%	-0.91%

Volatility

V3GS.L vs. VHVG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (V3GS.L) is 1.56%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) has a volatility of 2.72%. This indicates that V3GS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VHVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	V3GS.L	VHVG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.56%	2.72%	-1.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.02%	7.53%	-4.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.84%	10.27%	-6.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.55%	12.97%	-7.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.55%	15.06%	-9.51%

V3GS.L vs. VHVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

V3GS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VHVG.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

V3GS.L vs. VHVG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither V3GS.L nor VHVG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both V3GS.L and VHVG.L in my portfolio?

V3GS.L and VHVG.L have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, V3GS.L or VHVG.L?

On fees, VHVG.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, V3GS.L or VHVG.L?

VHVG.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for V3GS.L.

What is the main difference between V3GS.L and VHVG.L?

V3GS.L is categorized as Global Corporate Bonds, while VHVG.L is Global Equities. V3GS.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR Hdg GBP, while VHVG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for V3GS.L and 0.12% for VHVG.L.