PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
V3GS.L vs. HYLD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

V3GS.L vs. HYLD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (V3GS.L) and iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (HYLD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

V3GS.L is traded in GBP, while HYLD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HYLD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, V3GS.L achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly higher than HYLD.L's 0.53% return.


V3GS.L

1D
0.19%
1M
-0.58%
6M
0.97%
YTD
1.17%
1Y
6.30%
3Y*
8.80%
5Y*
3.42%
10Y*

HYLD.L

1D
-0.01%
1M
-1.76%
6M
0.14%
YTD
0.53%
1Y
3.90%
3Y*
6.41%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
4.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

V3GS.L vs. HYLD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
V3GS.L
Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating
1.17%10.46%7.79%12.25%-12.52%2.21%
HYLD.L
iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.53%6.27%4.40%7.88%-1.53%2.97%

Correlation

The correlation between V3GS.L and HYLD.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2021

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

V3GS.L vs. HYLD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

V3GS.L
V3GS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
V3GS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V3GS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
V3GS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
V3GS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
V3GS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

HYLD.L
HYLD.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
HYLD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYLD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYLD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
HYLD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYLD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

V3GS.L vs. HYLD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (V3GS.L) and iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (HYLD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


V3GS.LHYLD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.12

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

1.41

+1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.69

4.11

+5.58

V3GS.L vs. HYLD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current V3GS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the HYLD.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of V3GS.L and HYLD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

V3GS.L vs. HYLD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum V3GS.L drawdown since its inception was -18.23%, which is greater than HYLD.L's maximum drawdown of -16.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V3GS.L and HYLD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


V3GS.LHYLD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.23%

-16.98%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.14%

-2.75%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.73%

-3.81%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.23%

-9.38%

-8.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.96%

-1.93%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.49%

-2.94%

-1.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.65%

0.95%

-0.30%

Volatility

V3GS.L vs. HYLD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (V3GS.L) is 1.11%, while iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (HYLD.L) has a volatility of 1.76%. This indicates that V3GS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYLD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


V3GS.LHYLD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

1.76%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.07%

4.92%

-1.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.02%

5.98%

-1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.84%

7.78%

-1.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.77%

9.25%

-3.48%

V3GS.L vs. HYLD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

V3GS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than HYLD.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

V3GS.L vs. HYLD.L - Dividend Comparison

V3GS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than HYLD.L's 7.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYLD.L
iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
7.11%5.32%5.61%4.70%4.01%3.95%4.42%4.77%4.98%4.73%5.08%5.31%
V3GS.L
Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating
2.53%3.59%4.25%4.00%2.43%0.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


V3GS.L and HYLD.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, V3GS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

V3GS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HYLD.L.

V3GS.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR Hdg GBP, while HYLD.L tracks Markit iBoxx Global Developed Markets Liquid High Yield Capped (USD) Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for V3GS.L and 0.50% for HYLD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for V3GS.L and HYLD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer