PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
V3AB.L vs. VWRL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

V3AB.L vs. VWRL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3AB.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with V3AB.L having a 12.14% return and VWRL.L slightly lower at 11.87%.


V3AB.L

1D
0.03%
1M
6.33%
YTD
12.14%
6M
12.90%
1Y
30.24%
3Y*
17.81%
5Y*
11.91%
10Y*

VWRL.L

1D
-0.06%
1M
5.33%
YTD
11.87%
6M
12.31%
1Y
29.86%
3Y*
17.97%
5Y*
12.45%
10Y*
13.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

V3AB.L vs. VWRL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
V3AB.L
Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
12.14%12.22%19.77%17.95%-11.67%17.38%
VWRL.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing
11.87%13.99%19.59%15.61%-8.44%16.94%

Correlation

The correlation between V3AB.L and VWRL.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2021

0.97

The correlation between V3AB.L and VWRL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

V3AB.L vs. VWRL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
V3AB.L
VWRL.L

Technology

33.9%
29.0%

Financial Services

17.7%
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
9.4%

Communication Services

10.0%
8.8%

Healthcare

9.7%
8.0%

Industrials

6.4%
11.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
5.0%

Basic Materials

3.4%
3.8%

Real Estate

3.0%
1.9%

Utilities

0.4%
2.7%

Energy

0.0%
4.2%

Technology

V3AB.L
33.9%
VWRL.L
29.0%

Financial Services

V3AB.L
17.7%
VWRL.L
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

V3AB.L
11.2%
VWRL.L
9.4%

Communication Services

V3AB.L
10.0%
VWRL.L
8.8%

Healthcare

V3AB.L
9.7%
VWRL.L
8.0%

Industrials

V3AB.L
6.4%
VWRL.L
11.0%

Consumer Defensive

V3AB.L
4.4%
VWRL.L
5.0%

Basic Materials

V3AB.L
3.4%
VWRL.L
3.8%

Real Estate

V3AB.L
3.0%
VWRL.L
1.9%

Utilities

V3AB.L
0.4%
VWRL.L
2.7%

Energy

V3AB.L
0.0%
VWRL.L
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

V3AB.L vs. VWRL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

V3AB.L
V3AB.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
V3AB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V3AB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
V3AB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
V3AB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
V3AB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

VWRL.L
VWRL.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VWRL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

V3AB.L vs. VWRL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3AB.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


V3AB.LVWRL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.55

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.76

4.20

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.42

17.09

-1.68

V3AB.L vs. VWRL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current V3AB.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the VWRL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of V3AB.L and VWRL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


V3AB.LVWRL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

2.88

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.97

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.95

-0.03

Drawdowns

V3AB.L vs. VWRL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum V3AB.L drawdown since its inception was -19.00%, smaller than the maximum VWRL.L drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V3AB.L and VWRL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


V3AB.LVWRL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.00%

-24.98%

+5.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.00%

-7.08%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.00%

-17.48%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.00%

-17.48%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-0.48%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.22%

-3.30%

-0.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

1.74%

+0.22%

Volatility

V3AB.L vs. VWRL.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3AB.L) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L) at 2.97%. This indicates that V3AB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWRL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


V3AB.LVWRL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

2.97%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.82%

7.64%

+1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.66%

10.34%

+1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.72%

12.86%

+0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.67%

14.25%

-0.58%

V3AB.L vs. VWRL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

V3AB.L has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than VWRL.L's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

V3AB.L vs. VWRL.L - Dividend Comparison

V3AB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VWRL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
V3AB.L
Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWRL.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing
1.24%1.39%1.49%1.72%2.03%1.45%1.58%1.95%2.22%1.90%1.85%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, V3AB.L and VWRL.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VWRL.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VWRL.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for V3AB.L.

V3AB.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while VWRL.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for V3AB.L and 0.19% for VWRL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for V3AB.L and VWRL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer