V3AB.L vs. ESIE.L
V3AB.L (Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) and ESIE.L (iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - V3AB.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while ESIE.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, V3AB.L returned 11.91%/yr vs 19.85%/yr for ESIE.L. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. V3AB.L charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for ESIE.L.
Performance
V3AB.L vs. ESIE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, V3AB.L achieves a 12.14% return, which is significantly lower than ESIE.L's 34.22% return.
V3AB.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 6.33%
- YTD
- 12.14%
- 6M
- 12.90%
- 1Y
- 30.24%
- 3Y*
- 17.81%
- 5Y*
- 11.91%
- 10Y*
- —
ESIE.L
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- -2.31%
- YTD
- 34.22%
- 6M
- 30.17%
- 1Y
- 59.36%
- 3Y*
- 17.82%
- 5Y*
- 19.85%
- 10Y*
- —
V3AB.L vs. ESIE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
V3AB.L Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 12.14% | 12.22% | 19.77% | 17.95% | -11.67% | 17.38% |
ESIE.L iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 34.22% | 20.13% | -9.70% | 6.04% | 44.68% | 16.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between V3AB.L and ESIE.L is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2021 | 0.18 |
The correlation between V3AB.L and ESIE.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
V3AB.L vs. ESIE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
V3AB.L
ESIE.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Energy
Technology
V3AB.L
ESIE.L
-
Financial Services
V3AB.L
ESIE.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
V3AB.L
ESIE.L
-
Communication Services
V3AB.L
ESIE.L
Healthcare
V3AB.L
ESIE.L
-
Industrials
V3AB.L
ESIE.L
-
Consumer Defensive
V3AB.L
ESIE.L
-
Basic Materials
V3AB.L
ESIE.L
-
Real Estate
V3AB.L
ESIE.L
-
Utilities
V3AB.L
ESIE.L
-
Energy
V3AB.L
ESIE.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
V3AB.L vs. ESIE.L — Risk / Return Rank
V3AB.L
ESIE.L
V3AB.L vs. ESIE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3AB.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| V3AB.L | ESIE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.45 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.76 | 4.87 | -1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.42 | 14.82 | +0.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| V3AB.L | ESIE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58 | 2.58 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.82 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.86 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
V3AB.L vs. ESIE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum V3AB.L drawdown since its inception was -19.00%, smaller than the maximum ESIE.L drawdown of -27.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V3AB.L and ESIE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| V3AB.L | ESIE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.00% | -27.35% | +8.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.00% | -12.13% | +4.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.00% | -27.35% | +8.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.00% | -27.35% | +8.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -6.99% | +6.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.22% | -8.23% | +4.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 3.99% | -2.03% |
Volatility
V3AB.L vs. ESIE.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3AB.L) is 3.38%, while iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIE.L) has a volatility of 8.04%. This indicates that V3AB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESIE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| V3AB.L | ESIE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.38% | 8.04% | -4.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.82% | 19.18% | -10.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.66% | 22.92% | -11.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.72% | 24.32% | -10.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.67% | 24.58% | -10.91% |
V3AB.L vs. ESIE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
V3AB.L has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than ESIE.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
V3AB.L vs. ESIE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither V3AB.L nor ESIE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESIE.L iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
V3AB.L Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
V3AB.L and ESIE.L have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESIE.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESIE.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for V3AB.L.
V3AB.L is categorized as Global Equities, while ESIE.L is Energy Equities. V3AB.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while ESIE.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for V3AB.L and 0.18% for ESIE.L.
Find the right allocation for V3AB.L and ESIE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer