V3AB.L vs. EGMW.L
V3AB.L (Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) and EGMW.L (iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, from Vanguard and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, V3AB.L returned 11.91%/yr vs 11.70%/yr for EGMW.L. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. V3AB.L charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for EGMW.L.
Performance
V3AB.L vs. EGMW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, V3AB.L achieves a 12.14% return, which is significantly higher than EGMW.L's 9.42% return.
V3AB.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 6.33%
- YTD
- 12.14%
- 6M
- 12.90%
- 1Y
- 30.24%
- 3Y*
- 17.81%
- 5Y*
- 11.91%
- 10Y*
- —
EGMW.L
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 5.23%
- YTD
- 9.42%
- 6M
- 9.73%
- 1Y
- 25.53%
- 3Y*
- 16.40%
- 5Y*
- 11.70%
- 10Y*
- —
V3AB.L vs. EGMW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
V3AB.L Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 12.14% | 12.22% | 19.77% | 17.95% | -11.67% | 17.38% |
EGMW.L iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.42% | 11.08% | 20.29% | 16.47% | -11.09% | 21.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between V3AB.L and EGMW.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2021 | 0.97 |
The correlation between V3AB.L and EGMW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
V3AB.L vs. EGMW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
V3AB.L
EGMW.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Technology
V3AB.L
EGMW.L
Financial Services
V3AB.L
EGMW.L
Consumer Cyclical
V3AB.L
EGMW.L
Communication Services
V3AB.L
EGMW.L
Healthcare
V3AB.L
EGMW.L
Industrials
V3AB.L
EGMW.L
Consumer Defensive
V3AB.L
EGMW.L
Basic Materials
V3AB.L
EGMW.L
Real Estate
V3AB.L
EGMW.L
Utilities
V3AB.L
EGMW.L
Energy
V3AB.L
EGMW.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
V3AB.L vs. EGMW.L — Risk / Return Rank
V3AB.L
EGMW.L
V3AB.L vs. EGMW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3AB.L) and iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EGMW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| V3AB.L | EGMW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.46 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.76 | 3.56 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.42 | 14.23 | +1.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| V3AB.L | EGMW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58 | 2.46 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.88 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.79 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
V3AB.L vs. EGMW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum V3AB.L drawdown since its inception was -19.00%, smaller than the maximum EGMW.L drawdown of -23.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V3AB.L and EGMW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| V3AB.L | EGMW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.00% | -23.48% | +4.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.00% | -7.14% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.00% | -19.00% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.00% | -19.00% | 0.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -0.15% | -0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.22% | -3.95% | -0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 1.79% | +0.17% |
Volatility
V3AB.L vs. EGMW.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3AB.L) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EGMW.L) at 2.55%. This indicates that V3AB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EGMW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| V3AB.L | EGMW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.38% | 2.55% | +0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.82% | 7.35% | +1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.66% | 10.34% | +1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.72% | 13.31% | +0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.67% | 16.05% | -2.38% |
V3AB.L vs. EGMW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
V3AB.L has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than EGMW.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
V3AB.L vs. EGMW.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither V3AB.L nor EGMW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGMW.L iShares MSCI World ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
V3AB.L Vanguard ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, V3AB.L and EGMW.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EGMW.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EGMW.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for V3AB.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for V3AB.L and 0.20% for EGMW.L.
Find the right allocation for V3AB.L and EGMW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer