UXOC vs. UXJA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UXOC (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - October) and UXJA (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January) are both Defined Outcome funds from First Trust. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, UXOC returned 28.98% vs 29.61% for UXJA. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.

Performance

UXOC vs. UXJA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - October (UXOC) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with UXOC having a 11.39% return and UXJA slightly higher at 11.66%.

UXOC

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: 5.74%
• YTD: 11.39%
• 6M: 11.16%
• 1Y: 28.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UXJA

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 5.79%
• YTD: 11.66%
• 6M: 11.51%
• 1Y: 29.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UXOC vs. UXJA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UXOC FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - October	11.39%	13.70%
UXJA FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January	11.66%	13.93%

Correlation

The correlation between UXOC and UXJA is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2025	0.99

The correlation between UXOC and UXJA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

UXOC vs. UXJA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UXOC

UXOC Risk / Return Rank: 66
UXOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
UXOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
UXOC Omega Ratio Rank: 66
UXOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
UXOC Martin Ratio Rank: 71

UXJA

UXJA Risk / Return Rank: 66
UXJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
UXJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
UXJA Omega Ratio Rank: 65
UXJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
UXJA Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UXOC vs. UXJA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - October (UXOC) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UXOC	UXJA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	2.20	0.00
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.97	2.98	-0.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.38	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.97	3.03	-0.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.98	13.05	-0.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UXOC vs. UXJA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UXOC Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the UXJA Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UXOC and UXJA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UXOC	UXJA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.20	2.20	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.01	1.04	-0.03

Drawdowns

UXOC vs. UXJA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UXOC drawdown since its inception was -19.93%, roughly equal to the maximum UXJA drawdown of -20.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXOC and UXJA.

Drawdown Indicators

	UXOC	UXJA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.93%	-20.01%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.81%	-9.83%	+0.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.73%	-0.67%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.74%	-2.97%	+0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	2.27%	-0.03%

Volatility

UXOC vs. UXJA - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - October (UXOC) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA) have volatilities of 3.36% and 3.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UXOC	UXJA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.36%	3.40%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.90%	10.05%	-0.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.24%	13.54%	-0.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.96%	18.59%	-0.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.96%	18.59%	-0.63%

UXOC vs. UXJA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UXOC and UXJA have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

Dividends

UXOC vs. UXJA - Dividend Comparison

Neither UXOC nor UXJA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UXOC and UXJA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, UXOC and UXJA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, UXOC or UXJA?

UXJA has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to UXOC (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UXOC dropped -19.93% vs UXJA's -20.01%.

Which ETF is better, UXOC or UXJA?

On 1-year performance, UXJA leads with 29.61% vs 28.98% for UXOC. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UXOC or UXJA?

Over the 1-year period, UXJA has performed better with a 29.61% return vs 28.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UXOC or UXJA?

UXOC and UXJA have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UXOC or UXJA?

UXOC and UXJA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UXOC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.