PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UXOC vs. DMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UXOC vs. DMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - October (UXOC) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UXOC achieves a 11.39% return, which is significantly higher than DMAX's 2.34% return.


UXOC

1D
-0.73%
1M
5.74%
YTD
11.39%
6M
11.16%
1Y
28.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DMAX

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.86%
YTD
2.34%
6M
3.01%
1Y
8.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UXOC vs. DMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between UXOC and DMAX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025

0.85

The correlation between UXOC and DMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UXOC vs. DMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UXOC
UXOC Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
UXOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UXOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
UXOC Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
UXOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
UXOC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

DMAX
DMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
DMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UXOC vs. DMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - October (UXOC) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UXOCDMAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.20

3.65

-1.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.97

5.65

-2.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.79

-0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

6.01

-3.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.98

30.74

-17.75

UXOC vs. DMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UXOC Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is lower than the DMAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UXOC and DMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UXOCDMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

3.65

-1.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

2.14

-1.13

Drawdowns

UXOC vs. DMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UXOC drawdown since its inception was -19.93%, which is greater than DMAX's maximum drawdown of -3.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXOC and DMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UXOCDMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.93%

-3.37%

-16.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.81%

-1.41%

-8.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.07%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.74%

-0.38%

-2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

0.28%

+1.96%

Volatility

UXOC vs. DMAX - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - October (UXOC) has a higher volatility of 3.36% compared to iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX) at 0.32%. This indicates that UXOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UXOCDMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

0.32%

+3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

1.54%

+8.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.24%

2.33%

+10.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.96%

3.40%

+14.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.96%

3.40%

+14.56%

UXOC vs. DMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UXOC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

UXOC vs. DMAX - Dividend Comparison

UXOC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UXOC and DMAX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UXOC has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to DMAX (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UXOC dropped -19.93% vs DMAX's -3.37%.

On 1-year performance, UXOC leads with 28.98% vs 8.46% for DMAX. On fees, DMAX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DMAX has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, UXOC has performed better with a 28.98% return vs 8.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DMAX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXOC.

DMAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.00% for UXOC.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for UXOC and 0.50% for DMAX.

DMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UXOC and DMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer