UXJA vs. NFTY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UXJA (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January) and NFTY (First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UXJA is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while NFTY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. UXJA is actively managed, while NFTY is passively managed. Over the past year, UXJA returned 29.61% vs -8.48% for NFTY. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UXJA charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for NFTY.

Performance

UXJA vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UXJA achieves a 11.66% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -9.70% return.

UXJA

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 5.79%
• YTD: 11.66%
• 6M: 11.51%
• 1Y: 29.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NFTY

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: -1.64%
• YTD: -9.70%
• 6M: -7.99%
• 1Y: -8.48%
• 3Y*: 5.72%
• 5Y*: 4.62%
• 10Y*: 8.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UXJA vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UXJA FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January	11.66%	13.93%
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF	-9.70%	7.63%

Correlation

The correlation between UXJA and NFTY is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

UXJA vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UXJA

UXJA Risk / Return Rank: 66
UXJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
UXJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
UXJA Omega Ratio Rank: 65
UXJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
UXJA Martin Ratio Rank: 71

NFTY

NFTY Risk / Return Rank: 3
NFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
NFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
NFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 4
NFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
NFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UXJA vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UXJA	NFTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	-0.58	+2.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	-0.78	+3.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	0.91	+0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	-0.53	+3.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.05	-1.39	+14.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UXJA vs. NFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UXJA Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the NFTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UXJA and NFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UXJA	NFTY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.20	-0.58	+2.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.27	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.04	0.28	+0.76

Drawdowns

UXJA vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UXJA drawdown since its inception was -20.01%, smaller than the maximum NFTY drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXJA and NFTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	UXJA	NFTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.01%	-47.67%	+27.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.83%	-16.14%	+6.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.55%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.55%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-17.45%	+16.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.97%	-9.58%	+6.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.27%	6.12%	-3.85%

Volatility

UXJA vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA) is 3.40%, while First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that UXJA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UXJA	NFTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.40%	4.58%	-1.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.05%	12.57%	-2.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.54%	14.72%	-1.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.59%	17.39%	+1.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.59%	20.72%	-2.13%

UXJA vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

UXJA has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

UXJA vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison

UXJA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF	1.96%	1.24%	1.61%	0.13%	5.89%	1.53%	0.61%	0.97%	0.00%	4.10%	3.28%	4.39%
UXJA FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UXJA and NFTY in my portfolio?

UXJA and NFTY have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UXJA or NFTY?

NFTY has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to UXJA (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UXJA dropped -20.01% vs NFTY's -47.67%.

Which ETF is better, UXJA or NFTY?

On 1-year performance, UXJA leads with 29.61% vs -8.48% for NFTY. On fees, NFTY is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, UXJA has been the lower-risk option at 3.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UXJA or NFTY?

Over the 1-year period, UXJA has performed better with a 29.61% return vs -8.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UXJA or NFTY?

NFTY is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UXJA or NFTY?

NFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.00% for UXJA.

What is the main difference between UXJA and NFTY?

UXJA is categorized as Defined Outcome, while NFTY is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for UXJA and 0.80% for NFTY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UXJA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.