UXI vs. UTES
UXI (ProShares Ultra Industrials) and UTES (Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UXI is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Industrials Index (200%), while UTES is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners. UXI is passively managed, while UTES is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, UXI returned 19.65%/yr vs 12.27%/yr for UTES. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UXI charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for UTES.
Performance
UXI vs. UTES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UXI achieves a 23.82% return, which is significantly higher than UTES's 0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, UXI has outperformed UTES with an annualized return of 19.65%, while UTES has yielded a comparatively lower 12.27% annualized return.
UXI
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 23.82%
- 6M
- 21.89%
- 1Y
- 44.03%
- 3Y*
- 33.12%
- 5Y*
- 12.39%
- 10Y*
- 19.65%
UTES
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 8.95%
- 3Y*
- 22.00%
- 5Y*
- 15.32%
- 10Y*
- 12.27%
UXI vs. UTES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UXI ProShares Ultra Industrials | 23.82% | 28.84% | 26.48% | 27.34% | -32.90% | 34.64% | 16.37% | 67.44% | -28.13% | 51.81% |
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | 0.26% | 25.71% | 45.35% | -2.46% | 0.80% | 20.74% | -0.30% | 25.48% | 5.14% | 14.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between UXI and UTES is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015 | 0.37 |
The correlation between UXI and UTES shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
UXI vs. UTES - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UXI
UTES
Industrials
-
Utilities
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
UXI
UTES
-
Utilities
UXI
UTES
Technology
UXI
UTES
-
Consumer Cyclical
UXI
UTES
-
Basic Materials
UXI
-
UTES
-
Communication Services
UXI
-
UTES
-
Consumer Defensive
UXI
-
UTES
-
Energy
UXI
-
UTES
-
Financial Services
UXI
-
UTES
-
Healthcare
UXI
-
UTES
-
Real Estate
UXI
-
UTES
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UXI vs. UTES — Risk / Return Rank
UXI
UTES
UXI vs. UTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Industrials (UXI) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UXI | UTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.08 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 0.60 | +1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.23 | 1.32 | +4.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UXI vs. UTES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UXI drawdown since its inception was -89.01%, which is greater than UTES's maximum drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UXI and UTES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UXI | UTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.01% | -35.39% | -53.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.59% | -13.88% | -9.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.42% | -17.62% | -18.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.25% | -20.40% | -27.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.48% | -35.39% | -31.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.56% | -9.10% | +3.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.58% | -5.53% | -17.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.67% | 6.29% | +0.38% |
Volatility
UXI vs. UTES - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Industrials (UXI) has a higher volatility of 12.20% compared to Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) at 7.23%. This indicates that UXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UXI | UTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.20% | 7.23% | +4.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.14% | 17.05% | +10.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.32% | 21.32% | +11.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.13% | 20.62% | +15.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.52% | 20.17% | +19.35% |
UXI vs. UTES - Expense Ratio Comparison
UXI has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than UTES's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
UXI vs. UTES - Dividend Comparison
UXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than UTES's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | 1.49% | 1.42% | 1.51% | 2.44% | 2.13% | 1.94% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.09% | 3.44% | 3.53% | 0.61% |
UXI ProShares Ultra Industrials | 0.66% | 0.90% | 0.18% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.03% | 0.29% | 0.58% | 0.37% | 0.24% | 0.38% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UXI and UTES have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UXI has higher volatility (12.20%) compared to UTES (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UXI dropped -89.01% vs UTES's -35.39%.
On 10-year performance, UXI leads with 19.65% vs 12.27% for UTES. On fees, UTES is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, UTES has been the lower-risk option at 7.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UXI has performed better with a 19.65% return vs 12.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UTES is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UXI.
UTES has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.66% for UXI.
UXI is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while UTES is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UXI and 0.49% for UTES.
UXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UXI and UTES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer