UVPIX vs. UHPIX
UVPIX (ProFunds Ultra Short Emerging Market Fund) and UHPIX (ProFunds UltraShort China) are both Inverse Equities funds from ProFunds. Over the past 10 years, UVPIX returned -27.59%/yr vs -30.42%/yr for UHPIX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 1.78% expense ratio.
Performance
UVPIX vs. UHPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UVPIX achieves a -12.87% return, which is significantly lower than UHPIX's 49.76% return. Over the past 10 years, UVPIX has outperformed UHPIX with an annualized return of -27.59%, while UHPIX has yielded a comparatively lower -30.42% annualized return.
UVPIX
- 1D
- -3.41%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- -12.87%
- 6M
- -12.58%
- 1Y
- -40.36%
- 3Y*
- -30.26%
- 5Y*
- -19.45%
- 10Y*
- -27.59%
UHPIX
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- 22.01%
- YTD
- 49.76%
- 6M
- 54.16%
- 1Y
- 10.70%
- 3Y*
- -21.86%
- 5Y*
- -24.20%
- 10Y*
- -30.42%
UVPIX vs. UHPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UVPIX ProFunds Ultra Short Emerging Market Fund | -12.87% | -49.90% | -17.67% | -27.06% | 1.35% | 15.70% | -57.91% | -39.81% | 20.65% | -48.37% |
UHPIX ProFunds UltraShort China | 49.76% | -49.82% | -29.87% | -26.13% | -63.62% | 94.89% | -64.76% | -43.34% | 39.47% | -57.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between UVPIX and UHPIX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2008 | 0.85 |
The correlation between UVPIX and UHPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UVPIX vs. UHPIX — Risk / Return Rank
UVPIX
UHPIX
UVPIX vs. UHPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Ultra Short Emerging Market Fund (UVPIX) and ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UVPIX | UHPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.09 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | 0.29 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.18 | 0.51 | -1.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UVPIX vs. UHPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UVPIX drawdown since its inception was -99.86%, roughly equal to the maximum UHPIX drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UVPIX and UHPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UVPIX | UHPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.86% | -99.98% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.97% | -45.52% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.41% | -80.96% | +5.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.54% | -96.64% | +13.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.71% | -98.81% | +2.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.84% | -99.95% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.49% | -93.41% | +3.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.93% | 26.07% | +6.86% |
Volatility
UVPIX vs. UHPIX - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds Ultra Short Emerging Market Fund (UVPIX) has a higher volatility of 14.25% compared to ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX) at 11.70%. This indicates that UVPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UHPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UVPIX | UHPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.25% | 11.70% | +2.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.98% | 38.02% | -3.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.84% | 52.65% | -9.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.15% | 82.95% | -34.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.56% | 228.50% | -181.94% |
UVPIX vs. UHPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UVPIX and UHPIX have an expense ratio of 1.78%.
Dividends
UVPIX vs. UHPIX - Dividend Comparison
UVPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.32%, more than UHPIX's 2.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UHPIX ProFunds UltraShort China | 2.87% | 4.29% | 0.00% | 3.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.55% |
UVPIX ProFunds Ultra Short Emerging Market Fund | 10.32% | 8.99% | 0.00% | 7.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UVPIX and UHPIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UVPIX has higher volatility (14.25%) compared to UHPIX (11.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UVPIX dropped -99.86% vs UHPIX's -99.98%.
UHPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UVPIX and UHPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer