UVPIX vs. UHPIX
UVPIX (ProFunds Ultra Short Emerging Market Fund) and UHPIX (ProFunds UltraShort China) are both Inverse Equities funds from ProFunds. Over the past 10 years, UVPIX returned -26.92%/yr vs -30.35%/yr for UHPIX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 1.78% expense ratio.
Performance
UVPIX vs. UHPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UVPIX achieves a -14.55% return, which is significantly lower than UHPIX's 37.91% return. Over the past 10 years, UVPIX has outperformed UHPIX with an annualized return of -26.92%, while UHPIX has yielded a comparatively lower -30.35% annualized return.
UVPIX
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- -3.63%
- 6M
- -8.67%
- YTD
- -14.55%
- 1Y
- -38.03%
- 3Y*
- -32.40%
- 5Y*
- -19.84%
- 10Y*
- -26.92%
UHPIX
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 50.00%
- YTD
- 37.91%
- 1Y
- 6.97%
- 3Y*
- -25.48%
- 5Y*
- -26.52%
- 10Y*
- -30.35%
UVPIX vs. UHPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UVPIX ProFunds Ultra Short Emerging Market Fund | -14.55% | -49.90% | -17.67% | -27.06% | 1.35% | 15.70% | -57.91% | -39.81% | 20.65% | -48.37% |
UHPIX ProFunds UltraShort China | 37.91% | -49.82% | -29.87% | -26.13% | -63.62% | 94.89% | -64.76% | -43.34% | 39.47% | -57.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between UVPIX and UHPIX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2008 | 0.85 |
The correlation between UVPIX and UHPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UVPIX vs. UHPIX — Risk / Return Rank
UVPIX
UHPIX
UVPIX vs. UHPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Ultra Short Emerging Market Fund (UVPIX) and ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UVPIX | UHPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.06 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 0.13 | -0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | 0.25 | -1.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UVPIX vs. UHPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UVPIX drawdown since its inception was -99.86%, roughly equal to the maximum UHPIX drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UVPIX and UHPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UVPIX | UHPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.86% | -99.98% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.77% | -44.37% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.41% | -80.64% | +5.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.54% | -96.64% | +13.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.92% | -98.57% | +2.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.85% | -99.96% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.52% | -93.43% | +3.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.88% | 23.87% | +7.01% |
Volatility
UVPIX vs. UHPIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProFunds Ultra Short Emerging Market Fund (UVPIX) is 14.85%, while ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX) has a volatility of 15.70%. This indicates that UVPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UHPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UVPIX | UHPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.85% | 15.70% | -0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.75% | 38.84% | -3.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.88% | 53.65% | -9.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.25% | 82.96% | -34.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.47% | 228.55% | -182.08% |
UVPIX vs. UHPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UVPIX and UHPIX have an expense ratio of 1.78%.
Dividends
UVPIX vs. UHPIX - Dividend Comparison
UVPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.52%, more than UHPIX's 3.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UHPIX ProFunds UltraShort China | 3.11% | 4.29% | 0.00% | 3.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.55% |
UVPIX ProFunds Ultra Short Emerging Market Fund | 10.52% | 8.99% | 0.00% | 7.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UVPIX and UHPIX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UHPIX has higher volatility (15.70%) compared to UVPIX (14.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UVPIX dropped -99.86% vs UHPIX's -99.98%.
UHPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.11 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UVPIX and UHPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer