UVAL.L vs. VHVE.L
UVAL.L (SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF) and VHVE.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - UVAL.L is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while VHVE.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UVAL.L returned 13.79%/yr vs 13.32%/yr for VHVE.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UVAL.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for VHVE.L.
Performance
UVAL.L vs. VHVE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UVAL.L is traded in GBP, while VHVE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VHVE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UVAL.L achieves a 31.16% return, which is significantly higher than VHVE.L's 12.07% return.
UVAL.L
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 18.76%
- YTD
- 31.16%
- 6M
- 34.50%
- 1Y
- 67.14%
- 3Y*
- 23.73%
- 5Y*
- 13.79%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
VHVE.L
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 5.79%
- YTD
- 12.07%
- 6M
- 12.71%
- 1Y
- 30.21%
- 3Y*
- 18.56%
- 5Y*
- 13.32%
- 10Y*
- —
UVAL.L vs. VHVE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UVAL.L SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF | 31.16% | 19.90% | 6.56% | 9.53% | -4.90% | 31.55% | -1.54% | 2.98% |
VHVE.L Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc | 12.07% | 13.48% | 19.99% | 18.43% | -8.32% | 22.29% | 13.10% | 0.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between UVAL.L and VHVE.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.76 |
The correlation between UVAL.L and VHVE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
UVAL.L vs. VHVE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UVAL.L
VHVE.L
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
UVAL.L
VHVE.L
Financial Services
UVAL.L
VHVE.L
Healthcare
UVAL.L
VHVE.L
Communication Services
UVAL.L
VHVE.L
Consumer Cyclical
UVAL.L
VHVE.L
Industrials
UVAL.L
VHVE.L
Consumer Defensive
UVAL.L
VHVE.L
Energy
UVAL.L
VHVE.L
Utilities
UVAL.L
VHVE.L
Real Estate
UVAL.L
VHVE.L
Basic Materials
UVAL.L
VHVE.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UVAL.L vs. VHVE.L — Risk / Return Rank
UVAL.L
VHVE.L
UVAL.L vs. VHVE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF (UVAL.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc (VHVE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UVAL.L | VHVE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.88 | 1.48 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.08 | 4.46 | +7.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 42.84 | 17.45 | +25.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UVAL.L | VHVE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.96 | 2.55 | +2.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 0.93 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.82 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
UVAL.L vs. VHVE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UVAL.L drawdown since its inception was -32.55%, which is greater than VHVE.L's maximum drawdown of -25.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UVAL.L and VHVE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UVAL.L | VHVE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.55% | -25.61% | -6.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.53% | -6.75% | +1.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.03% | -18.38% | -2.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.03% | -18.38% | -2.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -0.33% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.12% | -3.34% | -1.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | 1.73% | -0.17% |
Volatility
UVAL.L vs. VHVE.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF (UVAL.L) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc (VHVE.L) at 3.59%. This indicates that UVAL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHVE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UVAL.L | VHVE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.62% | 3.59% | +2.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.96% | 9.13% | +0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.53% | 11.82% | +1.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.49% | 14.36% | +1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 16.32% | +1.02% |
UVAL.L vs. VHVE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UVAL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VHVE.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UVAL.L vs. VHVE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither UVAL.L nor VHVE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UVAL.L and VHVE.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VHVE.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VHVE.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for UVAL.L.
UVAL.L is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VHVE.L is Global Equities. UVAL.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while VHVE.L tracks FTSE Developed. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UVAL.L and 0.12% for VHVE.L.
Find the right allocation for UVAL.L and VHVE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer