PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UVAL.L vs. USSC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UVAL.L vs. USSC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF (UVAL.L) and SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UVAL.L is traded in GBP, while USSC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the USSC.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UVAL.L achieves a 31.16% return, which is significantly higher than USSC.L's 13.35% return. Over the past 10 years, UVAL.L has outperformed USSC.L with an annualized return of 13.99%, while USSC.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.89% annualized return.


UVAL.L

1D
-0.05%
1M
18.76%
YTD
31.16%
6M
34.50%
1Y
67.14%
3Y*
23.73%
5Y*
13.79%
10Y*
13.99%

USSC.L

1D
-0.23%
1M
1.99%
YTD
13.35%
6M
12.98%
1Y
36.88%
3Y*
16.37%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
12.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UVAL.L vs. USSC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UVAL.L
SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF
31.16%19.90%6.56%9.53%-4.90%31.55%-1.54%22.51%-7.42%8.19%
USSC.L
SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF
13.35%6.56%10.22%17.02%0.54%36.50%5.57%18.50%-10.28%0.29%

Correlation

The correlation between UVAL.L and USSC.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2015

0.82

The correlation between UVAL.L and USSC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

UVAL.L vs. USSC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UVAL.L
USSC.L

Technology

41.0%
9.4%

Financial Services

11.6%
19.8%

Healthcare

9.1%
7.5%

Communication Services

9.0%
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
14.0%

Industrials

6.8%
14.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
6.0%

Energy

3.6%
11.2%

Utilities

2.1%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.8%
6.2%

Basic Materials

1.8%
6.1%

Technology

UVAL.L
41.0%
USSC.L
9.4%

Financial Services

UVAL.L
11.6%
USSC.L
19.8%

Healthcare

UVAL.L
9.1%
USSC.L
7.5%

Communication Services

UVAL.L
9.0%
USSC.L
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

UVAL.L
8.9%
USSC.L
14.0%

Industrials

UVAL.L
6.8%
USSC.L
14.7%

Consumer Defensive

UVAL.L
4.3%
USSC.L
6.0%

Energy

UVAL.L
3.6%
USSC.L
11.2%

Utilities

UVAL.L
2.1%
USSC.L
2.5%

Real Estate

UVAL.L
1.8%
USSC.L
6.2%

Basic Materials

UVAL.L
1.8%
USSC.L
6.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UVAL.L vs. USSC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UVAL.L
UVAL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
UVAL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UVAL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
UVAL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
UVAL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
UVAL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

USSC.L
USSC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
USSC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USSC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
USSC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
USSC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
USSC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UVAL.L vs. USSC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF (UVAL.L) and SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UVAL.LUSSC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.88

1.41

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.08

5.15

+6.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

42.84

17.14

+25.70

UVAL.L vs. USSC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UVAL.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.96, which is higher than the USSC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UVAL.L and USSC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UVAL.LUSSC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.96

2.34

+2.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.52

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.58

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.52

+0.21

Drawdowns

UVAL.L vs. USSC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UVAL.L drawdown since its inception was -32.55%, smaller than the maximum USSC.L drawdown of -43.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UVAL.L and USSC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UVAL.LUSSC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.55%

-43.40%

+10.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.53%

-7.13%

+1.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.03%

-28.91%

+7.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.03%

-28.91%

+7.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.55%

-43.40%

+10.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-0.40%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-7.95%

+2.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

2.15%

-0.59%

Volatility

UVAL.L vs. USSC.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF (UVAL.L) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) at 3.65%. This indicates that UVAL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USSC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UVAL.LUSSC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

3.65%

+1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.96%

10.22%

-0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.53%

15.81%

-2.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.49%

20.60%

-5.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.34%

22.18%

-4.84%

UVAL.L vs. USSC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UVAL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than USSC.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

UVAL.L vs. USSC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither UVAL.L nor USSC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


UVAL.L and USSC.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UVAL.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UVAL.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for USSC.L.

UVAL.L is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while USSC.L is Small Cap Value Equities. UVAL.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while USSC.L tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UVAL.L and 0.30% for USSC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UVAL.L and USSC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer