UVAL.L vs. PSRF.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UVAL.L (SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF) and PSRF.L (Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 Value TR USD, from State Street and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UVAL.L returned 13.99%/yr vs 14.09%/yr for PSRF.L. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UVAL.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for PSRF.L.

Performance

UVAL.L vs. PSRF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF (UVAL.L) and Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF (PSRF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

UVAL.L is traded in GBP, while PSRF.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PSRF.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UVAL.L achieves a 31.16% return, which is significantly higher than PSRF.L's 15.01% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UVAL.L having a 13.99% annualized return and PSRF.L not far ahead at 14.09%.

UVAL.L

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 18.76%
• YTD: 31.16%
• 6M: 34.50%
• 1Y: 67.14%
• 3Y*: 23.73%
• 5Y*: 13.79%
• 10Y*: 13.99%

PSRF.L

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 4.44%
• YTD: 15.01%
• 6M: 15.45%
• 1Y: 33.26%
• 3Y*: 17.75%
• 5Y*: 13.10%
• 10Y*: 14.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UVAL.L vs. PSRF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UVAL.L SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF	31.16%	19.90%	6.56%	9.53%	-4.90%	31.55%	-1.54%	22.51%	-7.42%	8.19%
PSRF.L Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF	15.01%	8.58%	18.11%	9.53%	2.89%	32.90%	3.20%	22.49%	-4.27%	4.98%

Correlation

The correlation between UVAL.L and PSRF.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2015	0.93

The correlation between UVAL.L and PSRF.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UVAL.L vs. PSRF.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UVAL.L	PSRF.L
Technology	41.0%	21.4%
Financial Services	11.6%	15.5%
Healthcare	9.1%	12.1%
Communication Services	9.0%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	8.9%	8.4%
Industrials	6.8%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	6.5%
Energy	3.6%	8.7%
Utilities	2.1%	3.2%
Real Estate	1.8%	1.8%
Basic Materials	1.8%	3.4%

Return for Risk

UVAL.L vs. PSRF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UVAL.L

UVAL.L Risk / Return Rank: 97
UVAL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
UVAL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
UVAL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 97
UVAL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
UVAL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 97

PSRF.L

PSRF.L Risk / Return Rank: 94
PSRF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
PSRF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
PSRF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 93
PSRF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
PSRF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UVAL.L vs. PSRF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF (UVAL.L) and Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF (PSRF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UVAL.L	PSRF.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.96	3.54	+1.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.76	4.81	+1.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.88	1.66	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	12.08	7.20	+4.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	42.84	26.49	+16.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UVAL.L vs. PSRF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UVAL.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.96, which is higher than the PSRF.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UVAL.L and PSRF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UVAL.L	PSRF.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.96	3.54	+1.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89	0.99	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	0.90	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.82	-0.09

Drawdowns

UVAL.L vs. PSRF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UVAL.L drawdown since its inception was -32.55%, smaller than the maximum PSRF.L drawdown of -38.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UVAL.L and PSRF.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	UVAL.L	PSRF.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.55%	-38.37%	+5.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.53%	-4.60%	-0.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.03%	-18.14%	-2.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.03%	-18.14%	-2.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.55%	-29.79%	-2.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.05%	0.00%	-0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.12%	-4.15%	-0.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.56%	1.25%	+0.31%

Volatility

UVAL.L vs. PSRF.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF (UVAL.L) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF (PSRF.L) at 2.14%. This indicates that UVAL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSRF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UVAL.L	PSRF.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.62%	2.14%	+3.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.96%	6.28%	+3.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.53%	9.41%	+4.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.49%	13.32%	+2.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.34%	15.79%	+1.55%

UVAL.L vs. PSRF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UVAL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PSRF.L's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

UVAL.L vs. PSRF.L - Dividend Comparison

UVAL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSRF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PSRF.L Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF	1.20%	1.37%	1.46%	1.59%	1.70%	1.29%	1.78%	1.67%	1.78%	1.60%	1.51%	1.64%
UVAL.L SPDR MSCI USA Value Weighted UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UVAL.L and PSRF.L in my portfolio?

UVAL.L and PSRF.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UVAL.L or PSRF.L?

On fees, UVAL.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UVAL.L or PSRF.L?

UVAL.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PSRF.L.

What is the main difference between UVAL.L and PSRF.L?

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 Value TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UVAL.L and 0.39% for PSRF.L.