PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UURAF vs. BTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UURAF vs. BTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ucore Rare Metals Inc (UURAF) and B2Gold Corp. (BTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UURAF achieves a -6.09% return, which is significantly higher than BTG's -10.30% return. Over the past 10 years, UURAF has underperformed BTG with an annualized return of 1.72%, while BTG has yielded a comparatively higher 7.81% annualized return.


UURAF

1D
-8.64%
1M
-2.89%
YTD
-6.09%
6M
-12.53%
1Y
335.29%
3Y*
71.00%
5Y*
35.17%
10Y*
1.72%

BTG

1D
-4.52%
1M
-12.01%
YTD
-10.30%
6M
-15.19%
1Y
11.24%
3Y*
8.00%
5Y*
2.40%
10Y*
7.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UURAF vs. BTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UURAF
Ucore Rare Metals Inc
-6.09%636.59%-18.34%30.30%-13.33%-36.26%-46.47%112.50%-60.00%-17.80%
BTG
B2Gold Corp.
-10.30%88.95%-18.07%-7.22%-5.13%-26.97%42.35%37.72%-5.81%30.80%

Correlation

The correlation between UURAF and BTG is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2008

0.11

Over the past year, UURAF and BTG have become more correlated (0.35) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UURAF:

$421.07M

BTG:

$6.02B

EPS

UURAF:

-CA$0.41

BTG:

$0.36

PB Ratio

UURAF:

8.42

BTG:

1.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

UURAF:

CA$0.00

BTG:

$3.67B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UURAF:

-CA$1.84M

BTG:

$1.89B

EBITDA (TTM)

UURAF:

-CA$31.98M

BTG:

$1.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UURAF vs. BTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UURAF
UURAF Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
UURAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UURAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
UURAF Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
UURAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
UURAF Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

BTG
BTG Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
BTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTG Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
BTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTG Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UURAF vs. BTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ucore Rare Metals Inc (UURAF) and B2Gold Corp. (BTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UURAFBTGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.08

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.80

0.31

+5.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.06

0.59

+8.47

UURAF vs. BTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UURAF Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is higher than the BTG Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UURAF and BTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UURAF vs. BTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UURAF drawdown since its inception was -98.07%, which is greater than BTG's maximum drawdown of -85.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UURAF and BTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UURAFBTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.07%

-85.97%

-12.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.24%

-36.97%

-21.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.24%

-36.97%

-21.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.08%

-48.92%

-17.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.39%

-63.35%

-25.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.42%

-34.85%

-29.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.87%

-38.33%

-36.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.21%

19.18%

+18.03%

Volatility

UURAF vs. BTG - Volatility Comparison

Ucore Rare Metals Inc (UURAF) has a higher volatility of 29.28% compared to B2Gold Corp. (BTG) at 16.97%. This indicates that UURAF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UURAFBTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.28%

16.97%

+12.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.75%

45.38%

+23.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

118.84%

56.10%

+62.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

86.03%

44.89%

+41.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

98.79%

48.20%

+50.59%

Dividends

UURAF vs. BTG - Dividend Comparison

UURAF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BTG
B2Gold Corp.
2.00%1.77%6.56%5.06%4.48%4.07%1.96%0.25%
UURAF
Ucore Rare Metals Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

UURAF vs. BTG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ucore Rare Metals Inc and B2Gold Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B202220232024202520260
1.14B
(UURAF) Total Revenue
(BTG) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. UURAF values in CAD, BTG values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


UURAF and BTG have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UURAF has higher volatility (29.28%) compared to BTG (16.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UURAF dropped -98.07% vs BTG's -85.97%.

UURAF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UURAF and BTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer