UTSL vs. BSCQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UTSL (Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares) and BSCQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UTSL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Utilities Select Sector Index (300%), while BSCQ is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UTSL returned 8.32%/yr vs 1.47%/yr for BSCQ. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UTSL charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for BSCQ.

Performance

UTSL vs. BSCQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares (UTSL) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTSL achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly lower than BSCQ's 1.55% return.

UTSL

• 1D: -1.50%
• 1M: -17.87%
• YTD: 1.14%
• 6M: -5.29%
• 1Y: 9.70%
• 3Y*: 20.67%
• 5Y*: 8.32%
• 10Y*: —

BSCQ

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 1.55%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: 4.41%
• 3Y*: 5.06%
• 5Y*: 1.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTSL vs. BSCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UTSL Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares	1.14%	29.03%	54.24%	-35.55%	-14.06%	48.16%	-38.58%	81.07%	-2.27%	11.26%
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF	1.55%	5.02%	4.86%	5.71%	-8.31%	-1.68%	9.41%	13.94%	-2.40%	3.63%

Correlation

The correlation between UTSL and BSCQ is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2017	0.21

The correlation between UTSL and BSCQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UTSL vs. BSCQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UTSL	BSCQ
Utilities	100.0%	3.5%
Basic Materials	-	0.5%
Communication Services	-	1.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	6.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	3.9%
Energy	-	3.0%
Financial Services	-	32.7%
Healthcare	-	7.4%
Industrials	-	6.0%
Real Estate	-	2.9%
Technology	-	10.8%

Return for Risk

UTSL vs. BSCQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTSL

UTSL Risk / Return Rank: 13
UTSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
UTSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
UTSL Omega Ratio Rank: 13
UTSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
UTSL Martin Ratio Rank: 12

BSCQ

BSCQ Risk / Return Rank: 99
BSCQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Omega Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTSL vs. BSCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares (UTSL) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UTSL	BSCQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.22	7.06	-6.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.60	15.22	-14.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	3.45	-2.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.34	43.24	-42.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.73	179.65	-178.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UTSL vs. BSCQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTSL Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the BSCQ Sharpe Ratio of 7.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTSL and BSCQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UTSL	BSCQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22	7.06	-6.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	0.45	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	0.60	-0.47

Drawdowns

UTSL vs. BSCQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTSL drawdown since its inception was -79.55%, which is greater than BSCQ's maximum drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTSL and BSCQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	UTSL	BSCQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.55%	-16.50%	-63.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.45%	-0.10%	-28.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-46.22%	-1.13%	-45.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-68.01%	-13.02%	-54.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.53%	0.00%	-25.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.23%	-2.85%	-30.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.34%	0.02%	+13.32%

Volatility

UTSL vs. BSCQ - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares (UTSL) has a higher volatility of 16.50% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) at 0.17%. This indicates that UTSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UTSL	BSCQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.50%	0.17%	+16.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.86%	0.43%	+34.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.41%	0.63%	+42.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.02%	3.30%	+48.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.28%	4.77%	+54.51%

UTSL vs. BSCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTSL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCQ's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

UTSL vs. BSCQ - Dividend Comparison

UTSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than BSCQ's 4.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF	4.12%	4.14%	4.05%	3.53%	2.54%	1.91%	2.42%	2.96%	3.32%	2.92%	0.51%
UTSL Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares	1.80%	1.69%	1.61%	3.61%	1.15%	1.19%	1.40%	5.01%	1.46%	0.57%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UTSL and BSCQ in my portfolio?

UTSL and BSCQ have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UTSL or BSCQ?

UTSL has higher volatility (16.50%) compared to BSCQ (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTSL dropped -79.55% vs BSCQ's -16.50%.

Which ETF is better, UTSL or BSCQ?

On 5-year performance, UTSL leads with 8.32% vs 1.47% for BSCQ. On fees, BSCQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSCQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UTSL or BSCQ?

Over the 5-year period, UTSL has performed better with a 8.32% return vs 1.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UTSL or BSCQ?

BSCQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UTSL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UTSL or BSCQ?

BSCQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 1.80% for UTSL.

What is the main difference between UTSL and BSCQ?

UTSL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BSCQ is Corporate Bonds. UTSL tracks Utilities Select Sector Index (300%), while BSCQ tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for UTSL and 0.10% for BSCQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSCQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.06 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.