UTRE vs. SCHQ
UTRE (US Treasury 3 Year Note ETF) and SCHQ (Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - UTRE tracks the ICE BofA Current 3-Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross while SCHQ tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UTRE returned 3.81%/yr vs -0.04%/yr for SCHQ. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. UTRE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHQ.
Performance
UTRE vs. SCHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTRE achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly higher than SCHQ's -2.90% return.
UTRE
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 1.76%
- 3Y*
- 3.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.29%
SCHQ
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -3.17%
- 6M
- -2.56%
- YTD
- -2.90%
- 1Y
- -1.33%
- 3Y*
- -0.04%
- 5Y*
- -7.19%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -4.12%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $13.53M | $14.79M | $18.63M | |
| $202.14K | $202.39K | $275.66K |
UTRE vs. SCHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
UTRE US Treasury 3 Year Note ETF | 0.10% | 5.68% | 2.96% | 2.34% |
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | -2.90% | 5.50% | -6.44% | -1.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTRE and SCHQ is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2023 | 0.73 |
The correlation between UTRE and SCHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTRE vs. SCHQ — Risk / Return Rank
UTRE
SCHQ
UTRE vs. SCHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 3 Year Note ETF (UTRE) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UTRE | SCHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.98 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | -0.19 | +1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.88 | -0.41 | +3.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UTRE vs. SCHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTRE drawdown since its inception was -2.80%, smaller than the maximum SCHQ drawdown of -46.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTRE and SCHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTRE | SCHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.80% | -46.13% | +43.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.44% | -7.05% | +5.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.86% | -13.38% | +11.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | -38.39% | +37.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.78% | -26.61% | +25.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.61% | 3.23% | -2.62% |
Volatility
UTRE vs. SCHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for US Treasury 3 Year Note ETF (UTRE) is 0.51%, while Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) has a volatility of 2.30%. This indicates that UTRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTRE | SCHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.51% | 2.30% | -1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.57% | 6.30% | -4.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93% | 8.41% | -6.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.68% | 14.41% | -11.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.68% | 15.20% | -12.52% |
UTRE vs. SCHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTRE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHQ's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UTRE vs. SCHQ - Dividend Comparison
UTRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, less than SCHQ's 4.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 4.92% | 4.54% | 4.58% | 3.79% | 2.88% | 1.69% | 1.51% | 0.44% |
UTRE US Treasury 3 Year Note ETF | 3.52% | 3.60% | 4.01% | 3.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UTRE and SCHQ have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHQ has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to UTRE (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTRE dropped -2.80% vs SCHQ's -46.13%.
On 3-year performance, UTRE leads with 3.81% vs -0.04% for SCHQ. On fees, SCHQ is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, UTRE has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, UTRE has performed better with a 3.81% return vs -0.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHQ is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for UTRE.
SCHQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.92%, compared with 3.52% for UTRE.
UTRE tracks ICE BofA Current 3-Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SCHQ tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: US Benchmark Series and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UTRE and 0.03% for SCHQ.
UTRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UTRE and SCHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer