UTRE vs. BESF
UTRE (US Treasury 3 Year Note ETF) and BESF (Bastion Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UTRE is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA Current 3-Year US Treasury Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BESF is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Bastion. UTRE is passively managed, while BESF is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.24, they often move in opposite directions. UTRE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for BESF.
Performance
UTRE vs. BESF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTRE achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly lower than BESF's 19.74% return.
UTRE
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 0.06%
- 1Y
- 2.93%
- 3Y*
- 3.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BESF
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -4.08%
- YTD
- 19.74%
- 6M
- 21.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UTRE vs. BESF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UTRE US Treasury 3 Year Note ETF | -0.09% | 2.75% |
BESF Bastion Energy ETF | 19.74% | 41.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTRE and BESF is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | -0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTRE vs. BESF — Risk / Return Rank
UTRE
BESF
UTRE vs. BESF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 3 Year Note ETF (UTRE) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UTRE | BESF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.10 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UTRE | BESF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | 2.87 | -1.63 |
Drawdowns
UTRE vs. BESF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTRE drawdown since its inception was -2.80%, smaller than the maximum BESF drawdown of -9.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTRE and BESF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTRE | BESF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.80% | -9.89% | +7.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.07% | -5.88% | +4.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.77% | -2.45% | +1.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.48% | — | — |
Volatility
UTRE vs. BESF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTRE | BESF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.58% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.41% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02% | 24.33% | -22.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.70% | 24.33% | -21.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.70% | 24.33% | -21.63% |
UTRE vs. BESF - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTRE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BESF's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
UTRE vs. BESF - Dividend Comparison
UTRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, less than BESF's 5.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BESF Bastion Energy ETF | 5.68% | 6.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UTRE US Treasury 3 Year Note ETF | 3.50% | 3.60% | 4.01% | 3.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UTRE and BESF have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UTRE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UTRE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BESF.
BESF has the higher dividend yield at 5.68%, compared with 3.50% for UTRE.
UTRE is categorized as Government Bonds, while BESF is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: US Benchmark Series and Bastion. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UTRE and 0.80% for BESF.
Find the right allocation for UTRE and BESF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer