UTIL.L vs. XLUS.L
UTIL.L (SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF) and XLUS.L (Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both Utilities Equities funds - UTIL.L tracks the MSCI World/Utilities NR USD while XLUS.L tracks the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Utilities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UTIL.L returned 10.69%/yr vs 8.22%/yr for XLUS.L. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UTIL.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLUS.L.
Performance
UTIL.L vs. XLUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UTIL.L is traded in EUR, while XLUS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLUS.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTIL.L achieves a 12.98% return, which is significantly higher than XLUS.L's 2.66% return. Over the past 10 years, UTIL.L has outperformed XLUS.L with an annualized return of 10.69%, while XLUS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.22% annualized return.
UTIL.L
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -3.08%
- YTD
- 12.98%
- 6M
- 14.06%
- 1Y
- 26.75%
- 3Y*
- 16.59%
- 5Y*
- 11.83%
- 10Y*
- 10.69%
XLUS.L
- 1D
- -2.30%
- 1M
- -6.30%
- YTD
- 2.66%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- 1Y
- 6.72%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- 8.22%
UTIL.L vs. XLUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTIL.L SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF | 12.98% | 33.98% | 1.33% | 13.09% | -6.77% | 8.27% | 11.82% | 29.32% | 3.35% | 9.30% |
XLUS.L Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 2.66% | 1.95% | 30.59% | -10.51% | 8.22% | 27.33% | -9.50% | 28.09% | 7.74% | -2.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTIL.L and XLUS.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2014 | 0.44 |
UTIL.L vs. XLUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UTIL.L
XLUS.L
Utilities
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
UTIL.L
XLUS.L
Industrials
UTIL.L
XLUS.L
-
Basic Materials
UTIL.L
-
XLUS.L
-
Communication Services
UTIL.L
-
XLUS.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
UTIL.L
-
XLUS.L
-
Consumer Defensive
UTIL.L
-
XLUS.L
-
Energy
UTIL.L
-
XLUS.L
-
Financial Services
UTIL.L
-
XLUS.L
-
Healthcare
UTIL.L
-
XLUS.L
-
Real Estate
UTIL.L
-
XLUS.L
-
Technology
UTIL.L
-
XLUS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTIL.L vs. XLUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
UTIL.L
XLUS.L
UTIL.L vs. XLUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L) and Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UTIL.L | XLUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.08 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.65 | 0.72 | +2.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.27 | 1.48 | +8.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UTIL.L | XLUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 0.44 | +1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.55 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.44 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.64 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
UTIL.L vs. XLUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTIL.L drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, roughly equal to the maximum XLUS.L drawdown of -35.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTIL.L and XLUS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTIL.L | XLUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.59% | -35.92% | +1.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.30% | -9.36% | +2.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.48% | -15.82% | +2.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.12% | -29.58% | +7.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.59% | -35.92% | +1.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.13% | -8.67% | +3.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.98% | -8.02% | +2.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 4.52% | -1.92% |
Volatility
UTIL.L vs. XLUS.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L) has a higher volatility of 5.83% compared to Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLUS.L) at 5.46%. This indicates that UTIL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTIL.L | XLUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.83% | 5.46% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.89% | 12.25% | +0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.80% | 15.35% | -0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 17.27% | -1.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.71% | 18.55% | -0.84% |
UTIL.L vs. XLUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTIL.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than XLUS.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UTIL.L vs. XLUS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither UTIL.L nor XLUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UTIL.L and XLUS.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLUS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLUS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for UTIL.L.
UTIL.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while XLUS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Utilities Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for UTIL.L and 0.14% for XLUS.L.
Find the right allocation for UTIL.L and XLUS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer