PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTIL.L vs. XDWU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTIL.L vs. XDWU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UTIL.L is traded in EUR, while XDWU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XDWU.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTIL.L achieves a 13.22% return, which is significantly higher than XDWU.L's 7.33% return. Over the past 10 years, UTIL.L has outperformed XDWU.L with an annualized return of 10.77%, while XDWU.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.58% annualized return.


UTIL.L

1D
0.94%
1M
-4.47%
YTD
13.22%
6M
13.96%
1Y
27.26%
3Y*
16.68%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
10.77%

XDWU.L

1D
1.06%
1M
-4.73%
YTD
7.33%
6M
6.17%
1Y
14.17%
3Y*
12.41%
5Y*
10.19%
10Y*
8.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTIL.L vs. XDWU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UTIL.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF
13.22%33.98%1.33%13.09%-6.77%8.27%11.82%29.32%3.35%9.30%
XDWU.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C
7.33%11.76%19.34%-2.71%2.41%19.26%-4.52%26.96%5.12%0.68%

Correlation

The correlation between UTIL.L and XDWU.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2016

0.56

The correlation between UTIL.L and XDWU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

UTIL.L vs. XDWU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UTIL.L
XDWU.L

Utilities

95.4%
98.1%

Industrials

4.6%
1.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.5%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

UTIL.L
95.4%
XDWU.L
98.1%

Industrials

UTIL.L
4.6%
XDWU.L
1.4%

Basic Materials

UTIL.L

-

XDWU.L

-

Communication Services

UTIL.L

-

XDWU.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

UTIL.L

-

XDWU.L

-

Consumer Defensive

UTIL.L

-

XDWU.L

-

Energy

UTIL.L

-

XDWU.L
0.5%

Financial Services

UTIL.L

-

XDWU.L

-

Healthcare

UTIL.L

-

XDWU.L

-

Real Estate

UTIL.L

-

XDWU.L

-

Technology

UTIL.L

-

XDWU.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTIL.L vs. XDWU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTIL.L
UTIL.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
UTIL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWU.L
XDWU.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
XDWU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTIL.L vs. XDWU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UTIL.LXDWU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.19

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.72

1.85

+1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.55

5.40

+5.15

UTIL.L vs. XDWU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTIL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the XDWU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTIL.L and XDWU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTIL.LXDWU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

1.11

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.71

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.62

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.62

-0.12

Drawdowns

UTIL.L vs. XDWU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTIL.L drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, roughly equal to the maximum XDWU.L drawdown of -33.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTIL.L and XDWU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTIL.LXDWU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.59%

-33.47%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.30%

-7.62%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.48%

-12.65%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.12%

-23.34%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

-33.47%

-1.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.93%

-5.85%

+0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.98%

-7.73%

+1.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

2.61%

-0.03%

Volatility

UTIL.L vs. XDWU.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L) has a higher volatility of 6.02% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.L) at 4.31%. This indicates that UTIL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTIL.LXDWU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.02%

4.31%

+1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.91%

10.66%

+2.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.81%

12.69%

+2.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.22%

14.71%

+1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.71%

17.87%

-0.16%

UTIL.L vs. XDWU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTIL.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWU.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UTIL.L vs. XDWU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither UTIL.L nor XDWU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


UTIL.L and XDWU.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UTIL.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UTIL.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWU.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Utilities NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for UTIL.L and 0.25% for XDWU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTIL.L and XDWU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer