PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTIL.L vs. PQVG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTIL.L vs. PQVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UTIL.L is traded in EUR, while PQVG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PQVG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTIL.L achieves a 12.98% return, which is significantly lower than PQVG.L's 17.83% return.


UTIL.L

1D
-0.22%
1M
-3.08%
YTD
12.98%
6M
14.06%
1Y
26.75%
3Y*
16.59%
5Y*
11.83%
10Y*
10.69%

PQVG.L

1D
0.27%
1M
5.16%
YTD
17.83%
6M
18.25%
1Y
20.77%
3Y*
20.99%
5Y*
16.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTIL.L vs. PQVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UTIL.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF
12.98%33.98%1.33%13.09%-6.77%8.27%11.82%29.32%3.35%-3.36%
PQVG.L
Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF
17.83%0.32%38.68%3.12%6.74%36.09%-1.23%28.87%-3.19%10.97%

Correlation

The correlation between UTIL.L and PQVG.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017

0.31

The correlation between UTIL.L and PQVG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (3 years) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UTIL.L vs. PQVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UTIL.L
PQVG.L

Utilities

95.4%
0.8%

Industrials

4.6%
15.6%

Basic Materials

-

2.2%

Communication Services

-

10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.6%

Energy

-

5.6%

Financial Services

-

21.8%

Healthcare

-

9.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

24.3%

Utilities

UTIL.L
95.4%
PQVG.L
0.8%

Industrials

UTIL.L
4.6%
PQVG.L
15.6%

Basic Materials

UTIL.L

-

PQVG.L
2.2%

Communication Services

UTIL.L

-

PQVG.L
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

UTIL.L

-

PQVG.L
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

UTIL.L

-

PQVG.L
5.6%

Energy

UTIL.L

-

PQVG.L
5.6%

Financial Services

UTIL.L

-

PQVG.L
21.8%

Healthcare

UTIL.L

-

PQVG.L
9.5%

Real Estate

UTIL.L

-

PQVG.L

-

Technology

UTIL.L

-

PQVG.L
24.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTIL.L vs. PQVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTIL.L
UTIL.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
UTIL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

PQVG.L
PQVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PQVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
PQVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTIL.L vs. PQVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UTIL.LPQVG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.34

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

5.42

-1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.27

13.18

-2.91

UTIL.L vs. PQVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTIL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the PQVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTIL.L and PQVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTIL.LPQVG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.92

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

1.06

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.85

-0.35

Drawdowns

UTIL.L vs. PQVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTIL.L drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, roughly equal to the maximum PQVG.L drawdown of -33.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTIL.L and PQVG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTIL.LPQVG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.59%

-33.27%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.30%

-3.82%

-3.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.48%

-19.82%

+6.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.12%

-19.82%

-2.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.13%

0.00%

-5.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.98%

-4.99%

-0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

1.57%

+1.03%

Volatility

UTIL.L vs. PQVG.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L) has a higher volatility of 5.83% compared to Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L) at 2.39%. This indicates that UTIL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PQVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTIL.LPQVG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.83%

2.39%

+3.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.89%

7.93%

+4.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.80%

10.77%

+4.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.22%

15.67%

+0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.71%

16.94%

+0.77%

UTIL.L vs. PQVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTIL.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than PQVG.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

UTIL.L vs. PQVG.L - Dividend Comparison

UTIL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PQVG.L
Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF
0.77%0.82%0.82%1.61%1.77%0.87%1.59%1.41%1.30%0.72%
UTIL.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UTIL.L and PQVG.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UTIL.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UTIL.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PQVG.L.

UTIL.L is categorized as Utilities Equities, while PQVG.L is S&P 500. UTIL.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while PQVG.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index (Net Total Return). They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for UTIL.L and 0.35% for PQVG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTIL.L and PQVG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer