PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTIL.L vs. FRQX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTIL.L vs. FRQX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L) and Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF (FRQX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UTIL.L is traded in EUR, while FRQX.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FRQX.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTIL.L achieves a 13.22% return, which is significantly lower than FRQX.L's 48.03% return.


UTIL.L

1D
0.94%
1M
-4.47%
YTD
13.22%
6M
13.96%
1Y
27.26%
3Y*
16.68%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
10.77%

FRQX.L

1D
-0.62%
1M
16.14%
YTD
48.03%
6M
52.82%
1Y
78.64%
3Y*
26.66%
5Y*
15.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTIL.L vs. FRQX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UTIL.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF
13.22%33.98%1.33%13.09%-6.77%8.27%11.82%29.32%2.62%
FRQX.L
Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF
48.03%14.81%14.67%8.04%-7.55%12.83%-2.46%13.06%-5.96%

Correlation

The correlation between UTIL.L and FRQX.L is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2018

0.27

The correlation between UTIL.L and FRQX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UTIL.L vs. FRQX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UTIL.L
FRQX.L

Utilities

95.4%
1.9%

Industrials

4.6%
8.9%

Basic Materials

-

3.2%

Communication Services

-

2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.2%

Energy

-

2.3%

Financial Services

-

15.6%

Healthcare

-

2.2%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

54.7%

Utilities

UTIL.L
95.4%
FRQX.L
1.9%

Industrials

UTIL.L
4.6%
FRQX.L
8.9%

Basic Materials

UTIL.L

-

FRQX.L
3.2%

Communication Services

UTIL.L

-

FRQX.L
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

UTIL.L

-

FRQX.L
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

UTIL.L

-

FRQX.L
2.2%

Energy

UTIL.L

-

FRQX.L
2.3%

Financial Services

UTIL.L

-

FRQX.L
15.6%

Healthcare

UTIL.L

-

FRQX.L
2.2%

Real Estate

UTIL.L

-

FRQX.L
1.9%

Technology

UTIL.L

-

FRQX.L
54.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTIL.L vs. FRQX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTIL.L
UTIL.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
UTIL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQX.L
FRQX.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FRQX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTIL.L vs. FRQX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L) and Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF (FRQX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UTIL.LFRQX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.68

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.72

5.89

-2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.55

24.31

-13.76

UTIL.L vs. FRQX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTIL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is lower than the FRQX.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTIL.L and FRQX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTIL.LFRQX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

3.93

-2.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.98

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.67

-0.17

Drawdowns

UTIL.L vs. FRQX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTIL.L drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, which is greater than FRQX.L's maximum drawdown of -27.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTIL.L and FRQX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTIL.LFRQX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.59%

-27.07%

-7.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.30%

-13.29%

+5.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.48%

-20.65%

+7.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.12%

-20.65%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.93%

-0.62%

-4.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.98%

-5.12%

-0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

3.23%

-0.65%

Volatility

UTIL.L vs. FRQX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L) is 6.02%, while Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF (FRQX.L) has a volatility of 7.32%. This indicates that UTIL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRQX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTIL.LFRQX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.02%

7.32%

-1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.91%

17.04%

-4.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.81%

19.92%

-5.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.22%

15.33%

+0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.71%

16.99%

+0.72%

UTIL.L vs. FRQX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTIL.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQX.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

UTIL.L vs. FRQX.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither UTIL.L nor FRQX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


UTIL.L and FRQX.L have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UTIL.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UTIL.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FRQX.L.

UTIL.L is categorized as Utilities Equities, while FRQX.L is Asia Pacific Equities. UTIL.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while FRQX.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for UTIL.L and 0.40% for FRQX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTIL.L and FRQX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer