PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTIL.L vs. CSP1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTIL.L vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UTIL.L is traded in EUR, while CSP1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSP1.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTIL.L achieves a 19.11% return, which is significantly higher than CSP1.L's 13.29% return. Over the past 10 years, UTIL.L has underperformed CSP1.L with an annualized return of 10.87%, while CSP1.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.56% annualized return.


UTIL.L

1D
-0.61%
1M
3.56%
6M
15.01%
YTD
19.11%
1Y
33.13%
3Y*
18.63%
5Y*
12.73%
10Y*
10.87%

CSP1.L

1D
0.17%
1M
1.55%
6M
12.03%
YTD
13.29%
1Y
23.60%
3Y*
19.37%
5Y*
13.81%
10Y*
14.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTIL.L vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UTIL.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF
19.11%33.98%1.33%13.09%-6.77%8.27%11.82%29.32%3.36%9.29%
CSP1.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
13.29%3.67%33.49%22.33%-13.74%39.60%7.48%34.46%-1.22%6.46%

Correlation

The correlation between UTIL.L and CSP1.L is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2014

0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between UTIL.L and CSP1.L has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

UTIL.L vs. CSP1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UTIL.L
CSP1.L

Utilities

95.3%
2.2%

Industrials

4.7%
8.4%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Communication Services

-

10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.5%

Energy

-

3.0%

Financial Services

-

11.8%

Healthcare

-

9.0%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

-

37.9%

Utilities

UTIL.L
95.3%
CSP1.L
2.2%

Industrials

UTIL.L
4.7%
CSP1.L
8.4%

Basic Materials

UTIL.L

-

CSP1.L
1.7%

Communication Services

UTIL.L

-

CSP1.L
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

UTIL.L

-

CSP1.L
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

UTIL.L

-

CSP1.L
4.5%

Energy

UTIL.L

-

CSP1.L
3.0%

Financial Services

UTIL.L

-

CSP1.L
11.8%

Healthcare

UTIL.L

-

CSP1.L
9.0%

Real Estate

UTIL.L

-

CSP1.L
1.8%

Technology

UTIL.L

-

CSP1.L
37.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTIL.L vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTIL.L
UTIL.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
UTIL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

CSP1.L
CSP1.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTIL.L vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UTIL.LCSP1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.37

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.52

3.28

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.16

11.74

+0.43

UTIL.L vs. CSP1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTIL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTIL.L and CSP1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UTIL.L vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTIL.L drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, which is greater than CSP1.L's maximum drawdown of -32.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTIL.L and CSP1.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTIL.LCSP1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.59%

-32.91%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.30%

-7.17%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.05%

-22.35%

+9.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.12%

-22.35%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

-32.91%

-1.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-0.04%

-0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.98%

-4.33%

-1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

2.01%

+0.71%

Volatility

UTIL.L vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) at 2.77%. This indicates that UTIL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSP1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTIL.LCSP1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

2.77%

+1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.13%

7.90%

+5.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.12%

11.60%

+3.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.22%

20.59%

-4.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.32%

18.88%

-1.56%

UTIL.L vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTIL.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UTIL.L vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither UTIL.L nor CSP1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


UTIL.L and CSP1.L have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for UTIL.L.

UTIL.L is categorized as Utilities Equities, while CSP1.L is S&P 500. UTIL.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for UTIL.L and 0.07% for CSP1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTIL.L and CSP1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer