UTES vs. FDVV

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

UTES (Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF) and FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UTES is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by Virtus, while FDVV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index. UTES is actively managed, while FDVV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UTES returned 14.97%/yr vs 14.17%/yr for FDVV. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. UTES charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FDVV.

Performance

UTES vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTES achieves a -1.07% return, which is significantly lower than FDVV's 12.19% return.

UTES

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -2.93%
• 6M: 0.59%
• YTD: -1.07%
• 1Y: -4.33%
• 3Y*: 21.10%
• 5Y*: 14.97%
• 10Y*: 11.78%
• ALL TIME*: 13.50%

FDVV

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 3.10%
• 6M: 9.39%
• YTD: 12.19%
• 1Y: 20.46%
• 3Y*: 18.35%
• 5Y*: 14.17%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	$48.25M	$48.28M	$45.73M
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF	$11.16M	$10.04M	$13.72M

UTES vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF	-1.07%	25.71%	45.35%	-2.46%	0.80%	20.74%	-0.30%	25.48%	5.14%	14.21%
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	12.19%	17.08%	21.81%	18.00%	-4.21%	29.24%	2.80%	24.07%	-1.26%	14.00%

Correlation

The correlation between UTES and FDVV is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016	0.43

The correlation between UTES and FDVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UTES vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UTES	FDVV
Utilities	100.0%	9.1%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	3.4%
Consumer Cyclical	-	13.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	11.0%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	18.5%
Healthcare	-	3.3%
Industrials	-	3.2%
Real Estate	-	10.0%
Technology	-	28.1%

Return for Risk

UTES vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UTES

UTES Risk / Return Rank: 7
UTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
UTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
UTES Omega Ratio Rank: 8
UTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
UTES Martin Ratio Rank: 7

FDVV

FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 78
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 84
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UTES vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UTES	FDVV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.20	1.99	-2.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.14	2.77	-2.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.36	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.31	2.21	-2.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.65	9.10	-9.74

UTES vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTES Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTES and FDVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UTES vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTES drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, smaller than the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTES and FDVV.

Drawdown Indicators

	UTES	FDVV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.39%	-40.25%	+4.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.88%	-9.30%	-4.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.62%	-15.90%	-1.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.40%	-20.18%	-0.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.30%	-1.12%	-9.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.54%	-3.76%	-1.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.72%	2.26%	+4.46%

Volatility

UTES vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) has a higher volatility of 5.50% compared to Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) at 3.04%. This indicates that UTES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UTES	FDVV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.50%	3.04%	+2.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.19%	8.35%	+7.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.39%	10.37%	+11.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.74%	14.68%	+6.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.26%	16.91%	+3.35%

UTES vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTES has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

UTES vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

UTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than FDVV's 2.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	2.76%	2.89%	2.94%	3.77%	3.44%	2.70%	3.19%	3.93%	4.05%	3.66%	1.04%	0.00%
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF	1.53%	1.42%	1.51%	2.44%	2.13%	1.94%	2.09%	1.84%	2.09%	3.44%	3.53%	0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UTES and FDVV in my portfolio?

UTES and FDVV have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UTES or FDVV?

UTES has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to FDVV (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTES dropped -35.39% vs FDVV's -40.25%.

Which ETF is better, UTES or FDVV?

On 5-year performance, UTES leads with 14.97% vs 14.17% for FDVV. On fees, FDVV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UTES or FDVV?

Over the 5-year period, UTES has performed better with a 14.97% return vs 14.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UTES or FDVV?

FDVV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for UTES.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UTES or FDVV?

FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 1.53% for UTES.

What is the main difference between UTES and FDVV?

UTES is categorized as Utilities Equities, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Virtus and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for UTES and 0.29% for FDVV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.