PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTES vs. ECHI.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTES vs. ECHI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and Ninepoint Enhanced Canadian HighShares ETF (ECHI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UTES is traded in USD, while ECHI.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ECHI.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTES achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly lower than ECHI.TO's 12.52% return.


UTES

1D
1.56%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
0.26%
6M
0.49%
1Y
8.95%
3Y*
22.00%
5Y*
15.32%
10Y*
12.27%

ECHI.TO

1D
0.14%
1M
1.53%
YTD
12.52%
6M
13.97%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTES vs. ECHI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
0.26%0.38%
ECHI.TO
Ninepoint Enhanced Canadian HighShares ETF
12.52%21.82%

Correlation

The correlation between UTES and ECHI.TO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTES vs. ECHI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTES
UTES Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
UTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTES Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
UTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTES Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

ECHI.TO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTES vs. ECHI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and Ninepoint Enhanced Canadian HighShares ETF (ECHI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UTESECHI.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.32

UTES vs. ECHI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UTES vs. ECHI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTES drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, which is greater than ECHI.TO's maximum drawdown of -7.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTES and ECHI.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTESECHI.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.39%

-7.74%

-27.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.10%

-3.55%

-5.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.53%

-1.52%

-4.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.29%

Volatility

UTES vs. ECHI.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTESECHI.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.32%

18.51%

+2.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.62%

18.51%

+2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.17%

18.51%

+1.66%

UTES vs. ECHI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTES has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ECHI.TO's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

UTES vs. ECHI.TO - Dividend Comparison

UTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than ECHI.TO's 11.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ECHI.TO
Ninepoint Enhanced Canadian HighShares ETF
11.08%5.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
1.49%1.42%1.51%2.44%2.13%1.94%2.09%1.84%2.09%3.44%3.53%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


UTES and ECHI.TO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ECHI.TO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ECHI.TO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for UTES.

UTES is categorized as Utilities Equities, while ECHI.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and Ninepoint. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for UTES and 0.29% for ECHI.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTES and ECHI.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer