UTES vs. DIVO
UTES (Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF) and DIVO (Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UTES is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by Virtus, while DIVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, UTES returned 14.97%/yr vs 10.70%/yr for DIVO. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. UTES charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for DIVO.
Performance
UTES vs. DIVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTES achieves a -1.07% return, which is significantly lower than DIVO's 8.38% return.
UTES
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -2.93%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- -1.07%
- 1Y
- -4.33%
- 3Y*
- 21.10%
- 5Y*
- 14.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.78%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.50%
DIVO
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- 6M
- 5.32%
- YTD
- 8.38%
- 1Y
- 17.18%
- 3Y*
- 14.53%
- 5Y*
- 10.70%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.63%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $39.08M | $36.10M | $38.51M | |
| $11.16M | $10.04M | $13.72M |
UTES vs. DIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | -1.07% | 25.71% | 45.35% | -2.46% | 0.80% | 20.74% | -0.30% | 25.48% | 5.14% | 14.21% |
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 8.38% | 17.40% | 16.22% | 6.95% | -1.46% | 22.87% | 12.40% | 24.90% | -3.18% | 21.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTES and DIVO is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2016 | 0.41 |
The correlation between UTES and DIVO shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
UTES vs. DIVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UTES
DIVO
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
UTES
DIVO
Basic Materials
UTES
-
DIVO
Communication Services
UTES
-
DIVO
Consumer Cyclical
UTES
-
DIVO
Consumer Defensive
UTES
-
DIVO
Energy
UTES
-
DIVO
Financial Services
UTES
-
DIVO
Healthcare
UTES
-
DIVO
Industrials
UTES
-
DIVO
Real Estate
UTES
-
DIVO
-
Technology
UTES
-
DIVO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTES vs. DIVO — Risk / Return Rank
UTES
DIVO
UTES vs. DIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UTES | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.33 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | 2.90 | -3.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.65 | 10.27 | -10.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UTES vs. DIVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTES drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, which is greater than DIVO's maximum drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTES and DIVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTES | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.39% | -30.04% | -5.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.88% | -5.95% | -7.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.62% | -12.12% | -5.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.40% | -13.72% | -6.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.30% | -0.17% | -10.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.54% | -2.58% | -2.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.72% | 1.68% | +5.04% |
Volatility
UTES vs. DIVO - Volatility Comparison
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) has a higher volatility of 5.50% compared to Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) at 2.86%. This indicates that UTES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTES | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.50% | 2.86% | +2.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.19% | 7.22% | +8.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.39% | 9.32% | +12.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.74% | 11.91% | +8.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 14.77% | +5.49% |
UTES vs. DIVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTES has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVO's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
UTES vs. DIVO - Dividend Comparison
UTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than DIVO's 6.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.37% | 6.44% | 4.70% | 4.67% | 4.76% | 4.79% | 4.91% | 8.16% | 5.27% | 3.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | 1.53% | 1.42% | 1.51% | 2.44% | 2.13% | 1.94% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.09% | 3.44% | 3.53% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UTES and DIVO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UTES has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to DIVO (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTES dropped -35.39% vs DIVO's -30.04%.
On 5-year performance, UTES leads with 14.97% vs 10.70% for DIVO. On fees, UTES is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, DIVO has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, UTES has performed better with a 14.97% return vs 10.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UTES is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for DIVO.
DIVO has the higher dividend yield at 6.37%, compared with 1.53% for UTES.
UTES is categorized as Utilities Equities, while DIVO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Virtus and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for UTES and 0.56% for DIVO.
DIVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UTES and DIVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer