PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTES vs. DFJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTES vs. DFJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTES achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly lower than DFJ's 10.31% return. Over the past 10 years, UTES has outperformed DFJ with an annualized return of 12.27%, while DFJ has yielded a comparatively lower 9.18% annualized return.


UTES

1D
1.56%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
0.26%
6M
0.49%
1Y
8.95%
3Y*
22.00%
5Y*
15.32%
10Y*
12.27%

DFJ

1D
0.31%
1M
-1.56%
YTD
10.31%
6M
11.99%
1Y
28.50%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
9.75%
10Y*
9.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTES vs. DFJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
0.26%25.71%45.35%-2.46%0.80%20.74%-0.30%25.48%5.14%14.21%
DFJ
WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund
10.31%31.90%2.80%21.81%-9.00%0.38%1.29%16.98%-18.53%32.14%

Correlation

The correlation between UTES and DFJ is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015

0.25

UTES vs. DFJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UTES
DFJ

Utilities

100.0%
1.6%

Basic Materials

-

13.3%

Communication Services

-

1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

16.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.1%

Energy

-

0.6%

Financial Services

-

13.3%

Healthcare

-

4.1%

Industrials

-

27.0%

Real Estate

-

2.9%

Technology

-

12.6%

Utilities

UTES
100.0%
DFJ
1.6%

Basic Materials

UTES

-

DFJ
13.3%

Communication Services

UTES

-

DFJ
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

UTES

-

DFJ
16.1%

Consumer Defensive

UTES

-

DFJ
7.1%

Energy

UTES

-

DFJ
0.6%

Financial Services

UTES

-

DFJ
13.3%

Healthcare

UTES

-

DFJ
4.1%

Industrials

UTES

-

DFJ
27.0%

Real Estate

UTES

-

DFJ
2.9%

Technology

UTES

-

DFJ
12.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTES vs. DFJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTES
UTES Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
UTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTES Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
UTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTES Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

DFJ
DFJ Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
DFJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DFJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTES vs. DFJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) and WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UTESDFJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.29

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

2.11

-1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.32

5.97

-4.64

UTES vs. DFJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTES Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the DFJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTES and DFJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UTES vs. DFJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTES drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, smaller than the maximum DFJ drawdown of -46.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTES and DFJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTESDFJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.39%

-46.00%

+10.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.88%

-13.03%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.62%

-13.03%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

-29.71%

+9.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.39%

-40.02%

+4.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.10%

-5.85%

-3.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.53%

-11.15%

+5.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.29%

4.61%

+1.68%

Volatility

UTES vs. DFJ - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) has a higher volatility of 7.23% compared to WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ) at 4.87%. This indicates that UTES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTESDFJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.23%

4.87%

+2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.05%

13.79%

+3.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.32%

16.68%

+4.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.62%

15.94%

+4.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.17%

16.97%

+3.20%

UTES vs. DFJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTES has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than DFJ's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

UTES vs. DFJ - Dividend Comparison

UTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than DFJ's 2.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFJ
WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund
2.41%2.68%2.46%2.43%2.62%2.07%2.59%2.24%1.89%1.60%1.76%1.23%
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
1.49%1.42%1.51%2.44%2.13%1.94%2.09%1.84%2.09%3.44%3.53%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


UTES and DFJ have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UTES has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to DFJ (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTES dropped -35.39% vs DFJ's -46.00%.

On 10-year performance, UTES leads with 12.27% vs 9.18% for DFJ. On fees, UTES is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, DFJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UTES has performed better with a 12.27% return vs 9.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UTES is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DFJ.

DFJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 1.49% for UTES.

UTES is categorized as Utilities Equities, while DFJ is Japan Equities. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for UTES and 0.58% for DFJ.

DFJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTES and DFJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer