UTES.TO vs. UMVP.TO
UTES.TO (Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund) and UMVP.TO (Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds - UTES.TO tracks the Solactive Canada Utility Index while UMVP.TO tracks the Solactive Canadian Utility Services High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. UTES.TO charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for UMVP.TO.
Performance
UTES.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
UTES.TO
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- -0.62%
- 6M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 1Y
- 15.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.16%
UMVP.TO
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- 6M
- 8.05%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$80.39K | CA$55.77K | CA$51.00K | |
| CA$3.53M | CA$2.89M | CA$2.74M |
UTES.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
UTES.TO Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund | 8.92% |
UMVP.TO Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF | 11.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTES.TO and UMVP.TO is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2026 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTES.TO vs. UMVP.TO — Risk / Return Rank
UTES.TO
UMVP.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UTES.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund (UTES.TO) and Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF (UMVP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UTES.TO | UMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.71 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UTES.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTES.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.19%, which is greater than UMVP.TO's maximum drawdown of -4.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTES.TO and UMVP.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTES.TO | UMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.19% | -4.86% | -5.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.27% | -4.00% | -1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.56% | -1.13% | -1.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | — | — |
Volatility
UTES.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTES.TO | UMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.83% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.83% | 10.16% | +0.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.46% | 10.16% | +1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.46% | 10.16% | +1.30% |
UTES.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTES.TO has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than UMVP.TO's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
UTES.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Dividend Comparison
UTES.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.50%, more than UMVP.TO's 2.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
UMVP.TO Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF | 2.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UTES.TO Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund | 18.50% | 18.30% | 6.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UTES.TO and UMVP.TO have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UMVP.TO is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UMVP.TO is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for UTES.TO.
UTES.TO tracks Solactive Canada Utility Index, while UMVP.TO tracks Solactive Canadian Utility Services High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Evolve and Hamilton. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for UTES.TO and 0.19% for UMVP.TO.
Find the right allocation for UTES.TO and UMVP.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer