PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTES.TO vs. QQQY.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UTES.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO) and Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund (QQQY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UTES.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTES.TO achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly higher than QQQY.TO's -9.65% return.


UTES.TO

1D
-2.03%
1M
-0.62%
YTD
9.57%
6M
8.75%
1Y
21.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQY.TO

1D
3.10%
1M
-6.15%
YTD
-9.65%
6M
-5.13%
1Y
27.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UTES.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTES.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQY.TO's 0.74% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

UTES.TO vs. QQQY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTES.TO
UTES.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
UTES.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQY.TO
QQQY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
QQQY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTES.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO) and Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund (QQQY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UTES.TOQQQY.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.94

1.04

+0.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.54

1.63

+0.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.24

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

1.81

+0.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.83

6.67

+4.16

UTES.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTES.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the QQQY.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTES.TO and QQQY.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTES.TOQQQY.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

1.04

+0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.36

0.06

+1.30

Correlation

The correlation between UTES.TO and QQQY.TO is -0.17. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

UTES.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Dividend Comparison

UTES.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.76%, more than QQQY.TO's 14.52% yield.


TTM202520242023
UTES.TO
Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF
15.76%18.30%6.05%0.00%
QQQY.TO
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund
14.52%16.21%96.39%27.84%

Drawdowns

UTES.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTES.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.19%, smaller than the maximum QQQY.TO drawdown of -26.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTES.TO and QQQY.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UTES.TOQQQY.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.19%

-26.27%

+16.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

-14.91%

+6.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

-12.27%

+9.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.64%

-3.51%

+0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

4.04%

-2.03%

Volatility

UTES.TO vs. QQQY.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO) is 3.44%, while Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund (QQQY.TO) has a volatility of 7.54%. This indicates that UTES.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UTES.TOQQQY.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

7.54%

-4.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.98%

15.39%

-8.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.00%

26.30%

-15.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.12%

46,687.01%

-46,675.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.12%

46,687.01%

-46,675.89%