PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTES.TO vs. HHIS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTES.TO vs. HHIS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO) and Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTES.TO achieves a 12.58% return, which is significantly higher than HHIS.TO's 9.32% return.


UTES.TO

1D
-0.26%
1M
2.26%
YTD
12.58%
6M
12.56%
1Y
23.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HHIS.TO

1D
-1.25%
1M
7.52%
YTD
9.32%
6M
4.61%
1Y
31.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UTES.TO vs. HHIS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between UTES.TO and HHIS.TO is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2025

-0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTES.TO vs. HHIS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTES.TO
UTES.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
UTES.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

HHIS.TO
HHIS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
HHIS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HHIS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
HHIS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
HHIS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
HHIS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTES.TO vs. HHIS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO) and Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UTES.TOHHIS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.24

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

1.31

+2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.90

3.27

+8.62

UTES.TO vs. HHIS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTES.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the HHIS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTES.TO and HHIS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTES.TOHHIS.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

1.38

+1.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.38

0.74

+0.64

Drawdowns

UTES.TO vs. HHIS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTES.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.19%, smaller than the maximum HHIS.TO drawdown of -31.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTES.TO and HHIS.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTES.TOHHIS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.19%

-31.83%

+21.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.39%

-24.43%

+18.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.86%

-2.95%

+1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.62%

-8.70%

+6.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

9.79%

-7.76%

Volatility

UTES.TO vs. HHIS.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO) is 2.96%, while Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO) has a volatility of 5.51%. This indicates that UTES.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HHIS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTES.TOHHIS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

5.51%

-2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.51%

16.97%

-9.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.28%

23.36%

-14.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.01%

33.78%

-22.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.01%

33.78%

-22.77%

UTES.TO vs. HHIS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTES.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than HHIS.TO's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

UTES.TO vs. HHIS.TO - Dividend Comparison

UTES.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.48%, less than HHIS.TO's 26.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
HHIS.TO
Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF
26.63%22.88%0.00%
UTES.TO
Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF
17.48%18.30%6.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


UTES.TO and HHIS.TO have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HHIS.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HHIS.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for UTES.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Evolve and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for UTES.TO and 0.00% for HHIS.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTES.TO and HHIS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer