PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTES.TO vs. HBIL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UTES.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO) and Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UTES.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTES.TO achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly higher than HBIL.TO's -0.05% return.


UTES.TO

1D
-2.03%
1M
-0.62%
YTD
9.57%
6M
8.75%
1Y
21.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HBIL.TO

1D
-0.27%
1M
-0.95%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
0.35%
1Y
1.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UTES.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTES.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than HBIL.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

UTES.TO vs. HBIL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTES.TO
UTES.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
UTES.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

HBIL.TO
HBIL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
HBIL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBIL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBIL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
HBIL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBIL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTES.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO) and Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UTES.TOHBIL.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.94

0.85

+1.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.54

1.19

+1.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.16

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

1.33

+1.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.83

3.88

+6.95

UTES.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTES.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the HBIL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTES.TO and HBIL.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTES.TOHBIL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

0.85

+1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.36

0.49

+0.86

Correlation

The correlation between UTES.TO and HBIL.TO is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

UTES.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Dividend Comparison

UTES.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.76%, more than HBIL.TO's 6.67% yield.


Drawdowns

UTES.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTES.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.19%, which is greater than HBIL.TO's maximum drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTES.TO and HBIL.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UTES.TOHBIL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.19%

-1.69%

-8.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

-1.30%

-6.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

-0.95%

-1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.64%

-0.48%

-2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

0.45%

+1.56%

Volatility

UTES.TO vs. HBIL.TO - Volatility Comparison

Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO) at 0.72%. This indicates that UTES.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HBIL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UTES.TOHBIL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

0.72%

+2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.98%

1.14%

+5.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.00%

1.86%

+9.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.12%

2.06%

+9.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.12%

2.06%

+9.06%