UTES.TO vs. FCMI.TO
UTES.TO (Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF) and FCMI.TO (Fidelity Canadian Monthly High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UTES.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Evolve, while FCMI.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, UTES.TO returned 22.32% vs 19.31% for FCMI.TO. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UTES.TO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FCMI.TO.
Performance
UTES.TO vs. FCMI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UTES.TO achieves a 14.43% return, which is significantly higher than FCMI.TO's 9.25% return.
UTES.TO
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 14.81%
- YTD
- 14.43%
- 1Y
- 22.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCMI.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- 6M
- 7.41%
- YTD
- 9.25%
- 1Y
- 19.31%
- 3Y*
- 13.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.04%
- 10Y*
- —
UTES.TO vs. FCMI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
UTES.TO Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF | 14.43% | 18.66% | -4.15% |
FCMI.TO Fidelity Canadian Monthly High Income ETF | 9.25% | 15.02% | 2.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between UTES.TO and FCMI.TO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UTES.TO vs. FCMI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
UTES.TO
FCMI.TO
UTES.TO vs. FCMI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO) and Fidelity Canadian Monthly High Income ETF (FCMI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UTES.TO | FCMI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.80 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.51 | 5.36 | -1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.26 | 20.61 | -10.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UTES.TO vs. FCMI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UTES.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.19%, smaller than the maximum FCMI.TO drawdown of -63.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTES.TO and FCMI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UTES.TO | FCMI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.19% | -63.80% | +53.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.39% | -3.62% | -2.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -10.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -18.96% | +17.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.57% | -41.60% | +39.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | 0.94% | +1.24% |
Volatility
UTES.TO vs. FCMI.TO - Volatility Comparison
Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to Fidelity Canadian Monthly High Income ETF (FCMI.TO) at 2.10%. This indicates that UTES.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCMI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UTES.TO | FCMI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 2.10% | +2.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.34% | 4.99% | +3.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.32% | 6.39% | +3.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.33% | 7.80% | +3.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.33% | 22.20% | -10.87% |
UTES.TO vs. FCMI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
UTES.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FCMI.TO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
UTES.TO vs. FCMI.TO - Dividend Comparison
UTES.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.45%, more than FCMI.TO's 3.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCMI.TO Fidelity Canadian Monthly High Income ETF | 3.28% | 3.38% | 3.63% | 4.09% | 3.73% | 2.76% | 6.22% |
UTES.TO Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF | 17.45% | 18.30% | 6.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UTES.TO and FCMI.TO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FCMI.TO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FCMI.TO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for UTES.TO.
UTES.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while FCMI.TO is Canada Equities. They also come from different issuers: Evolve and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for UTES.TO and 0.50% for FCMI.TO.
Find the right allocation for UTES.TO and FCMI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer