PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTES.TO vs. EMAX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UTES.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO) and Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UTES.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
UTES.TO
Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF
9.57%18.66%-4.25%
EMAX.TO
Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
31.32%4.63%-0.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTES.TO achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly lower than EMAX.TO's 31.32% return.


UTES.TO

1D
-2.03%
1M
-0.62%
YTD
9.57%
6M
8.75%
1Y
21.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EMAX.TO

1D
-1.98%
1M
11.00%
YTD
31.32%
6M
31.82%
1Y
30.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UTES.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTES.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than EMAX.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

UTES.TO vs. EMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UTES.TO
UTES.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
UTES.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

EMAX.TO
EMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
EMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
EMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UTES.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO) and Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UTES.TOEMAX.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.94

1.16

+0.78

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.54

1.55

+1.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.24

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

1.54

+1.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.83

4.01

+6.82

UTES.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTES.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the EMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTES.TO and EMAX.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UTES.TOEMAX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

1.16

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.36

0.81

+0.54

Correlation

The correlation between UTES.TO and EMAX.TO is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

UTES.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison

UTES.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.76%, more than EMAX.TO's 9.29% yield.


Drawdowns

UTES.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTES.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.19%, smaller than the maximum EMAX.TO drawdown of -27.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTES.TO and EMAX.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UTES.TOEMAX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.19%

-27.55%

+17.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.29%

-20.97%

+12.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

-3.30%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.64%

-9.52%

+6.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

8.03%

-6.02%

Volatility

UTES.TO vs. EMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO) is 3.44%, while Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO) has a volatility of 5.45%. This indicates that UTES.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UTES.TOEMAX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

5.45%

-2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.98%

13.03%

-6.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.00%

26.34%

-15.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.12%

22.14%

-11.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.12%

22.14%

-11.02%