PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UTBPX vs. TGRNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UTBPX vs. TGRNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS Multi Income Bond Fund (UTBPX) and TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund (TGRNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UTBPX achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly higher than TGRNX's 0.03% return.


UTBPX

1D
0.08%
1M
-1.10%
6M
-0.40%
YTD
0.12%
1Y
3.07%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
0.15%
10Y*
1.74%
ALL TIME*
1.98%

TGRNX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.88%
6M
-0.22%
YTD
0.03%
1Y
2.38%
3Y*
4.43%
5Y*
-0.06%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

UTBPX vs. TGRNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UTBPX
UBS Multi Income Bond Fund
0.12%6.60%1.67%6.67%-11.74%-1.49%6.51%10.62%1.54%
TGRNX
TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund
0.03%6.76%3.08%5.73%-13.43%-0.60%8.57%9.15%1.43%

Correlation

The correlation between UTBPX and TGRNX is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2018

0.87

The correlation between UTBPX and TGRNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UTBPX vs. TGRNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UTBPX
UTBPX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
UTBPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTBPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTBPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
UTBPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTBPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

TGRNX
TGRNX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
TGRNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGRNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGRNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
TGRNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGRNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UTBPX vs. TGRNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Multi Income Bond Fund (UTBPX) and TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund (TGRNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UTBPXTGRNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.20

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

1.39

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.71

4.11

+0.60

UTBPX vs. TGRNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UTBPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the TGRNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UTBPX and TGRNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UTBPX vs. TGRNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UTBPX drawdown since its inception was -16.84%, smaller than the maximum TGRNX drawdown of -17.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UTBPX and TGRNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UTBPXTGRNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.84%

-17.85%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.98%

-2.47%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.35%

-3.36%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.78%

-17.77%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-1.42%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.98%

-5.14%

+1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

0.84%

+0.02%

Volatility

UTBPX vs. TGRNX - Volatility Comparison

UBS Multi Income Bond Fund (UTBPX) has a higher volatility of 1.17% compared to TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund (TGRNX) at 0.81%. This indicates that UTBPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TGRNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UTBPXTGRNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.17%

0.81%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.31%

2.44%

+0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.97%

3.09%

+0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.90%

4.84%

+0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.37%

4.79%

-0.42%

UTBPX vs. TGRNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UTBPX has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is higher than TGRNX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

UTBPX vs. TGRNX - Dividend Comparison

UTBPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, more than TGRNX's 3.95% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
TGRNX
TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund
3.95%4.31%4.48%3.30%2.69%2.76%4.20%4.38%0.43%0.00%0.00%
UTBPX
UBS Multi Income Bond Fund
4.30%4.18%4.53%3.54%2.84%1.89%2.11%2.80%3.05%2.46%1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


UTBPX and TGRNX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UTBPX has higher volatility (1.17%) compared to TGRNX (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UTBPX dropped -16.84% vs TGRNX's -17.85%.

TGRNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UTBPX and TGRNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer