PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USUP.DE vs. BCFE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USUP.DE vs. BCFE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (USUP.DE) and UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (BCFE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USUP.DE achieves a 9.01% return, which is significantly lower than BCFE.DE's 17.15% return.


USUP.DE

1D
-0.16%
1M
2.06%
YTD
9.01%
6M
9.64%
1Y
14.03%
3Y*
7.72%
5Y*
4.92%
10Y*

BCFE.DE

1D
-1.12%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
17.15%
6M
18.41%
1Y
28.89%
3Y*
12.43%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USUP.DE vs. BCFE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
USUP.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc
9.01%4.91%9.07%10.08%-14.14%9.68%13.38%
BCFE.DE
UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
17.15%16.62%3.14%-7.92%14.03%30.33%16.98%

Correlation

The correlation between USUP.DE and BCFE.DE is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2020

0.16

The correlation between USUP.DE and BCFE.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.16 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USUP.DE vs. BCFE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USUP.DE
USUP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
USUP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USUP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
USUP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
USUP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
USUP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

BCFE.DE
BCFE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
BCFE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCFE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCFE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
BCFE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCFE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USUP.DE vs. BCFE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (USUP.DE) and UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (BCFE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USUP.DEBCFE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.40

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

4.83

-3.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.89

11.89

-7.00

USUP.DE vs. BCFE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USUP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the BCFE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USUP.DE and BCFE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USUP.DEBCFE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

2.14

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.55

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.49

-0.06

Drawdowns

USUP.DE vs. BCFE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USUP.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.61%, smaller than the maximum BCFE.DE drawdown of -32.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USUP.DE and BCFE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USUP.DEBCFE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.61%

-32.93%

+13.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-6.14%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.36%

-11.00%

-6.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.61%

-27.28%

+7.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-4.36%

+4.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.91%

-13.69%

+7.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

2.50%

+0.28%

Volatility

USUP.DE vs. BCFE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (USUP.DE) is 3.49%, while UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (BCFE.DE) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that USUP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCFE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USUP.DEBCFE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

4.33%

-0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.06%

12.10%

+0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.91%

13.88%

+3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.51%

17.51%

-2.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.21%

15.30%

-0.09%

USUP.DE vs. BCFE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

USUP.DE has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than BCFE.DE's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

USUP.DE vs. BCFE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither USUP.DE nor BCFE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


USUP.DE and BCFE.DE have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, USUP.DE is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

USUP.DE is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for BCFE.DE.

USUP.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while BCFE.DE is Commodities. USUP.DE tracks MSCI Pacific SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while BCFE.DE tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.28% for USUP.DE and 0.34% for BCFE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USUP.DE and BCFE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer