PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USTY.L vs. VUTA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USTY.L vs. VUTA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USTY.L) and Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VUTA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USTY.L achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly higher than VUTA.L's 0.03% return.


USTY.L

1D
0.21%
1M
1.14%
YTD
0.66%
6M
0.16%
1Y
6.01%
3Y*
1.22%
5Y*
1.37%
10Y*
2.28%

VUTA.L

1D
0.21%
1M
1.16%
YTD
0.03%
6M
-0.52%
1Y
4.50%
3Y*
0.21%
5Y*
0.65%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USTY.L vs. VUTA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
USTY.L
SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
0.66%0.10%3.36%-1.37%-1.66%-0.86%4.57%5.73%
VUTA.L
Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.03%-1.12%2.50%-1.89%-1.88%-1.09%3.97%5.44%

Correlation

The correlation between USTY.L and VUTA.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2019

0.99

The correlation between USTY.L and VUTA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USTY.L vs. VUTA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USTY.L
USTY.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
USTY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USTY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
USTY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
USTY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
USTY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

VUTA.L
VUTA.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
VUTA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUTA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUTA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
VUTA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUTA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USTY.L vs. VUTA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USTY.L) and Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VUTA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USTY.LVUTA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.13

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

0.86

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.15

2.08

+1.07

USTY.L vs. VUTA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USTY.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is comparable to the VUTA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USTY.L and VUTA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USTY.LVUTA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

0.75

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.08

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.08

+0.23

Drawdowns

USTY.L vs. VUTA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USTY.L drawdown since its inception was -23.02%, roughly equal to the maximum VUTA.L drawdown of -23.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USTY.L and VUTA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USTY.LVUTA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.02%

-23.40%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.20%

-5.21%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.75%

-8.20%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.04%

-16.17%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.58%

-18.49%

+2.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.04%

-15.38%

+3.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

2.16%

-0.26%

Volatility

USTY.L vs. VUTA.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USTY.L) has a higher volatility of 2.21% compared to Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VUTA.L) at 1.39%. This indicates that USTY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUTA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USTY.LVUTA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.21%

1.39%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.79%

4.40%

+0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.35%

5.98%

+0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.77%

8.70%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.02%

9.39%

+0.63%

USTY.L vs. VUTA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both USTY.L and VUTA.L have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USTY.L vs. VUTA.L - Dividend Comparison

USTY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, while VUTA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
USTY.L
SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
4.87%4.61%3.81%2.81%1.57%1.31%2.49%2.79%2.11%2.11%1.66%
VUTA.L
Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, USTY.L and VUTA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

USTY.L and VUTA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.

USTY.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Index, while VUTA.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate US Treasury Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USTY.L and VUTA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer