PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USTY.L vs. SUSW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USTY.L vs. SUSW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USTY.L) and iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SUSW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

USTY.L is traded in GBP, while SUSW.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SUSW.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USTY.L achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than SUSW.L's 10.44% return.


USTY.L

1D
0.21%
1M
0.98%
YTD
0.66%
6M
0.18%
1Y
6.23%
3Y*
1.22%
5Y*
1.37%
10Y*
2.28%

SUSW.L

1D
0.30%
1M
4.00%
YTD
10.44%
6M
10.27%
1Y
21.80%
3Y*
13.10%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USTY.L vs. SUSW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USTY.L
SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
0.66%0.10%3.36%-1.37%-1.66%-0.86%4.57%4.20%7.22%-2.41%
SUSW.L
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
10.44%7.34%12.96%18.37%-12.08%27.61%17.02%24.81%-2.13%1.80%

Correlation

The correlation between USTY.L and SUSW.L is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2017

0.00

The correlation between USTY.L and SUSW.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (5 years) to 0.10 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USTY.L vs. SUSW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USTY.L
USTY.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
USTY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USTY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
USTY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
USTY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
USTY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

SUSW.L
SUSW.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SUSW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUSW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUSW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SUSW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUSW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USTY.L vs. SUSW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USTY.L) and iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SUSW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USTY.LSUSW.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.34

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

2.76

-1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.15

10.28

-7.12

USTY.L vs. SUSW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USTY.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the SUSW.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USTY.L and SUSW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USTY.LSUSW.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

1.83

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.75

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.75

-0.44

Drawdowns

USTY.L vs. SUSW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USTY.L drawdown since its inception was -23.02%, smaller than the maximum SUSW.L drawdown of -24.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USTY.L and SUSW.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USTY.LSUSW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.02%

-24.50%

+1.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.20%

-7.77%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.75%

-20.11%

+12.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.04%

-20.11%

+4.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.58%

0.00%

-15.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.04%

-4.01%

-8.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

2.10%

-0.20%

Volatility

USTY.L vs. SUSW.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USTY.L) is 2.21%, while iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SUSW.L) has a volatility of 3.54%. This indicates that USTY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUSW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USTY.LSUSW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.21%

3.54%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.79%

8.89%

-4.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.35%

11.71%

-5.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.77%

14.16%

-5.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.02%

15.84%

-5.82%

USTY.L vs. SUSW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

USTY.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SUSW.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USTY.L vs. SUSW.L - Dividend Comparison

USTY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, while SUSW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SUSW.L
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USTY.L
SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
4.87%4.61%3.81%2.81%1.57%1.31%2.49%2.79%2.11%2.11%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


USTY.L and SUSW.L have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, USTY.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

USTY.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SUSW.L.

USTY.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while SUSW.L is Global Equities. USTY.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Index, while SUSW.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for USTY.L and 0.20% for SUSW.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USTY.L and SUSW.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer