PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USTB vs. FCSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

USTB vs. FCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF (USTB) and Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF (FCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

USTB vs. FCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
USTB
VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF
0.29%6.08%6.49%6.69%-2.82%0.07%
FCSH
Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF
0.43%6.42%4.66%5.45%-5.87%0.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USTB achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than FCSH's 0.43% return.


USTB

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.65%
YTD
0.29%
6M
1.49%
1Y
4.55%
3Y*
5.99%
5Y*
3.42%
10Y*

FCSH

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.71%
YTD
0.43%
6M
1.60%
1Y
4.90%
3Y*
5.00%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


USTB vs. FCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

USTB has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than FCSH's 0.30% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

USTB vs. FCSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USTB
USTB Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
USTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
USTB Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
USTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
USTB Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

FCSH
FCSH Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USTB vs. FCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF (USTB) and Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF (FCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USTBFCSHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.08

2.24

+0.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.91

3.42

+1.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

1.46

+0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.42

3.99

+1.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.04

15.82

+8.23

USTB vs. FCSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USTB Sharpe Ratio is 3.08, which is higher than the FCSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USTB and FCSH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USTBFCSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.08

2.24

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.70

0.87

+0.83

Correlation

The correlation between USTB and FCSH is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

USTB vs. FCSH - Dividend Comparison

USTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, more than FCSH's 4.11% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
USTB
VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF
4.61%4.62%5.05%4.49%2.54%1.84%2.59%2.69%2.32%0.43%
FCSH
Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF
4.11%4.14%4.44%2.31%1.76%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

USTB vs. FCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USTB drawdown since its inception was -5.32%, smaller than the maximum FCSH drawdown of -8.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USTB and FCSH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


USTBFCSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-8.47%

+3.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.84%

-1.24%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-0.71%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.67%

-2.28%

+1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.19%

0.31%

-0.12%

Volatility

USTB vs. FCSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF (USTB) is 0.48%, while Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF (FCSH) has a volatility of 1.02%. This indicates that USTB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


USTBFCSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.48%

1.02%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.83%

1.38%

-0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48%

2.19%

-0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.01%

2.92%

-0.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.02%

2.92%

-0.90%