USTB vs. DDV
USTB (VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF) and DDV (Defined Duration 5 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USTB is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg 1–3 Year Credit Index, while DDV is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Discipline Funds. USTB is passively managed, while DDV is actively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USTB charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DDV.
Performance
USTB vs. DDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USTB achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly lower than DDV's 2.25% return.
USTB
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- 4.79%
- 3Y*
- 6.14%
- 5Y*
- 3.52%
- 10Y*
- —
DDV
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 2.25%
- 6M
- 2.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USTB vs. DDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
USTB VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF | 1.23% | 0.72% |
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 2.25% | 0.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between USTB and DDV is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2025 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USTB vs. DDV — Risk / Return Rank
USTB
DDV
USTB vs. DDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF (USTB) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USTB | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.96 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 6.76 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.89 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.28 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.05 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USTB | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.96 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.73 | 2.09 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
USTB vs. DDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USTB drawdown since its inception was -5.32%, which is greater than DDV's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USTB and DDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USTB | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.32% | -1.92% | -3.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -4.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.09% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.66% | -0.35% | -0.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.19% | — | — |
Volatility
USTB vs. DDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USTB | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.34% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.84% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26% | 2.69% | -1.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.01% | 2.69% | -0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.01% | 2.69% | -0.68% |
USTB vs. DDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
USTB has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than DDV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
USTB vs. DDV - Dividend Comparison
USTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, more than DDV's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 1.21% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USTB VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF | 4.58% | 4.62% | 5.05% | 4.49% | 2.54% | 1.84% | 2.59% | 2.69% | 2.32% | 0.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USTB and DDV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for USTB.
USTB has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 1.21% for DDV.
USTB is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while DDV is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: Victory and Discipline Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for USTB and 0.25% for DDV.
Find the right allocation for USTB and DDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer