PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USSL.TO vs. HXS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

USSL.TO vs. HXS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Index ETF (USSL.TO) and Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

USSL.TO vs. HXS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
USSL.TO
Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Index ETF
-7.35%13.42%22.04%
HXS.TO
Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF
-3.28%11.93%17.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USSL.TO achieves a -7.35% return, which is significantly lower than HXS.TO's -3.28% return.


USSL.TO

1D
0.55%
1M
-8.11%
YTD
-7.35%
6M
-5.54%
1Y
12.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HXS.TO

1D
2.76%
1M
-3.20%
YTD
-3.28%
6M
-2.17%
1Y
13.01%
3Y*
18.86%
5Y*
13.61%
10Y*
14.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


USSL.TO vs. HXS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

USSL.TO has a 1.34% expense ratio, which is higher than HXS.TO's 0.10% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

USSL.TO vs. HXS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USSL.TO
USSL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
USSL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USSL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
USSL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
USSL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
USSL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

HXS.TO
HXS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
HXS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USSL.TO vs. HXS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Index ETF (USSL.TO) and Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USSL.TOHXS.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.62

0.70

-0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.05

1.07

-0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.17

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

1.16

-0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.76

4.32

-1.57

USSL.TO vs. HXS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USSL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is comparable to the HXS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USSL.TO and HXS.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USSL.TOHXS.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

0.70

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.96

-0.23

Correlation

The correlation between USSL.TO and HXS.TO is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

USSL.TO vs. HXS.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither USSL.TO nor HXS.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

USSL.TO vs. HXS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USSL.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.90%, smaller than the maximum HXS.TO drawdown of -27.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USSL.TO and HXS.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


USSL.TOHXS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.90%

-27.42%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.29%

-12.44%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.30%

-6.22%

-4.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.66%

-3.57%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.00%

3.33%

+0.67%

Volatility

USSL.TO vs. HXS.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Index ETF (USSL.TO) is 4.50%, while Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) has a volatility of 5.16%. This indicates that USSL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HXS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


USSL.TOHXS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

5.16%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.60%

9.53%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.38%

18.62%

+3.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.79%

15.14%

+4.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.79%

16.53%

+3.26%