PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USSC.L vs. UDVD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USSC.L vs. UDVD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USSC.L achieves a 12.93% return, which is significantly higher than UDVD.L's 6.88% return. Over the past 10 years, USSC.L has outperformed UDVD.L with an annualized return of 12.01%, while UDVD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.88% annualized return.


USSC.L

1D
-0.49%
1M
0.86%
YTD
12.93%
6M
13.58%
1Y
35.93%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
12.01%

UDVD.L

1D
0.54%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
6.88%
6M
7.75%
1Y
13.07%
3Y*
9.70%
5Y*
5.64%
10Y*
8.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USSC.L vs. UDVD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USSC.L
SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF
12.93%14.73%8.33%23.17%-10.14%35.22%8.76%23.19%-15.30%9.79%
UDVD.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
6.88%8.57%7.64%2.06%-0.33%25.04%0.77%22.66%-3.94%15.71%

Correlation

The correlation between USSC.L and UDVD.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2015

0.82

The correlation between USSC.L and UDVD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

USSC.L vs. UDVD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USSC.L
UDVD.L

Financial Services

19.8%
11.5%

Industrials

14.7%
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

14.0%
5.2%

Energy

11.2%
4.5%

Technology

9.4%
8.9%

Healthcare

7.5%
6.2%

Real Estate

6.2%
4.6%

Basic Materials

6.1%
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.0%
17.0%

Communication Services

2.7%
3.5%

Utilities

2.5%
14.8%

Financial Services

USSC.L
19.8%
UDVD.L
11.5%

Industrials

USSC.L
14.7%
UDVD.L
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

USSC.L
14.0%
UDVD.L
5.2%

Energy

USSC.L
11.2%
UDVD.L
4.5%

Technology

USSC.L
9.4%
UDVD.L
8.9%

Healthcare

USSC.L
7.5%
UDVD.L
6.2%

Real Estate

USSC.L
6.2%
UDVD.L
4.6%

Basic Materials

USSC.L
6.1%
UDVD.L
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

USSC.L
6.0%
UDVD.L
17.0%

Communication Services

USSC.L
2.7%
UDVD.L
3.5%

Utilities

USSC.L
2.5%
UDVD.L
14.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USSC.L vs. UDVD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USSC.L
USSC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
USSC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USSC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
USSC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
USSC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
USSC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

UDVD.L
UDVD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
UDVD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USSC.L vs. UDVD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USSC.LUDVD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.23

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.40

1.84

+2.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.10

4.71

+9.39

USSC.L vs. UDVD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USSC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the UDVD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USSC.L and UDVD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USSC.LUDVD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

1.31

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.41

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.57

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.71

-0.26

Drawdowns

USSC.L vs. UDVD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USSC.L drawdown since its inception was -48.99%, which is greater than UDVD.L's maximum drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USSC.L and UDVD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USSC.LUDVD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.99%

-36.12%

-12.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.12%

-7.06%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.47%

-15.26%

-12.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.47%

-15.26%

-12.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.99%

-36.12%

-12.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-3.71%

+3.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.70%

-3.44%

-4.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

2.77%

-0.23%

Volatility

USSC.L vs. UDVD.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L) at 2.84%. This indicates that USSC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UDVD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USSC.LUDVD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

2.84%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.08%

7.08%

+3.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.01%

9.95%

+6.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.62%

13.92%

+7.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.82%

15.70%

+7.12%

USSC.L vs. UDVD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

USSC.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than UDVD.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

USSC.L vs. UDVD.L - Dividend Comparison

USSC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UDVD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UDVD.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
2.05%2.17%2.03%2.24%2.13%2.15%2.36%2.01%2.27%1.78%1.83%2.06%
USSC.L
SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USSC.L and UDVD.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, USSC.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

USSC.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for UDVD.L.

USSC.L is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while UDVD.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. USSC.L tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index, while UDVD.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for USSC.L and 0.35% for UDVD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USSC.L and UDVD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer