USPX vs. FJUN
USPX (Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF) and FJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - USPX tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index while FJUN tracks the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index June. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USPX returned 12.39%/yr vs 11.05%/yr for FJUN. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USPX charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FJUN.
Performance
USPX vs. FJUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USPX achieves a 10.64% return, which is significantly higher than FJUN's 4.64% return.
USPX
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.64%
- 6M
- 10.50%
- 1Y
- 27.42%
- 3Y*
- 22.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.39%
- 10Y*
- —
FJUN
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 4.64%
- 6M
- 5.30%
- 1Y
- 13.82%
- 3Y*
- 14.38%
- 5Y*
- 11.05%
- 10Y*
- —
USPX vs. FJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USPX Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF | 10.64% | 17.78% | 24.97% | 27.07% | -18.88% | 19.53% | 17.60% |
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June | 4.64% | 11.05% | 16.38% | 22.30% | -4.95% | 11.47% | 11.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between USPX and FJUN is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2020 | 0.93 |
The correlation between USPX and FJUN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
USPX vs. FJUN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USPX
FJUN
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
USPX
FJUN
Financial Services
USPX
FJUN
Communication Services
USPX
FJUN
Consumer Cyclical
USPX
FJUN
Healthcare
USPX
FJUN
Industrials
USPX
FJUN
Consumer Defensive
USPX
FJUN
Energy
USPX
FJUN
Utilities
USPX
FJUN
Real Estate
USPX
FJUN
Basic Materials
USPX
FJUN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USPX vs. FJUN — Risk / Return Rank
USPX
FJUN
USPX vs. FJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USPX | FJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.49 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 3.36 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.72 | 18.98 | -5.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USPX | FJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 2.28 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 1.05 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 1.17 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
USPX vs. FJUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USPX drawdown since its inception was -31.21%, which is greater than FJUN's maximum drawdown of -13.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USPX and FJUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USPX | FJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.21% | -13.26% | -17.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.15% | -4.13% | -5.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.21% | -13.26% | -5.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.60% | -13.26% | -11.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -0.18% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.44% | -1.67% | -2.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 0.73% | +1.27% |
Volatility
USPX vs. FJUN - Volatility Comparison
Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) at 0.41%. This indicates that USPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FJUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USPX | FJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 0.41% | +2.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.16% | 4.35% | +4.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.09% | 6.11% | +5.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 10.55% | +5.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.92% | 10.27% | +5.65% |
USPX vs. FJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
USPX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FJUN's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
USPX vs. FJUN - Dividend Comparison
USPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, while FJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USPX Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF | 1.04% | 1.07% | 1.23% | 1.35% | 2.21% | 2.40% | 2.51% | 3.07% | 2.91% | 2.60% | 4.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, USPX and FJUN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
USPX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to FJUN (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USPX dropped -31.21% vs FJUN's -13.26%.
On 5-year performance, USPX leads with 12.39% vs 11.05% for FJUN. On fees, USPX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USPX has performed better with a 12.39% return vs 11.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USPX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FJUN.
USPX has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.00% for FJUN.
USPX tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index, while FJUN tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index June. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for USPX and 0.85% for FJUN.
FJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USPX and FJUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer