USPX vs. BTR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

USPX (Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF) and BTR (Beacon Tactical Risk ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. USPX is passively managed, while BTR is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, USPX returned 20.72%/yr vs 4.25%/yr for BTR. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USPX charges 0.03%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for BTR.

Performance

USPX vs. BTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX) and Beacon Tactical Risk ETF (BTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with USPX having a 7.94% return and BTR slightly higher at 7.96%.

USPX

• 1D: -1.35%
• 1M: -1.23%
• YTD: 7.94%
• 6M: 6.89%
• 1Y: 23.21%
• 3Y*: 20.72%
• 5Y*: 11.89%
• 10Y*: 12.60%

BTR

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -0.71%
• YTD: 7.96%
• 6M: 7.23%
• 1Y: 17.86%
• 3Y*: 4.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USPX vs. BTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
USPX Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF	7.94%	17.78%	24.97%	16.85%
BTR Beacon Tactical Risk ETF	7.96%	-2.15%	14.45%	-6.78%

Correlation

The correlation between USPX and BTR is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023	0.73

The correlation between USPX and BTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

USPX vs. BTR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	USPX	BTR
Technology	37.7%	12.7%
Financial Services	11.6%	7.2%
Communication Services	10.3%	9.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	9.5%
Healthcare	8.8%	8.8%
Industrials	8.0%	9.2%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	7.8%
Energy	3.3%	10.4%
Utilities	2.5%	8.4%
Real Estate	1.8%	8.2%
Basic Materials	1.7%	8.4%

Return for Risk

USPX vs. BTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USPX

USPX Risk / Return Rank: 59
USPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
USPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
USPX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
USPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
USPX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

BTR

BTR Risk / Return Rank: 61
BTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
BTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
BTR Omega Ratio Rank: 58
BTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
BTR Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USPX vs. BTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX) and Beacon Tactical Risk ETF (BTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USPX	BTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	1.80	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	2.53	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.33	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.55	2.88	-0.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.19	11.05	+0.13

USPX vs. BTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the BTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USPX and BTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

USPX vs. BTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USPX drawdown since its inception was -31.21%, which is greater than BTR's maximum drawdown of -16.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USPX and BTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	USPX	BTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.21%	-16.67%	-14.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.15%	-6.23%	-2.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.21%	-16.67%	-2.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.60%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.17%	-1.33%	-1.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.43%	-5.51%	+1.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	1.62%	+0.46%

Volatility

USPX vs. BTR - Volatility Comparison

Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to Beacon Tactical Risk ETF (BTR) at 2.92%. This indicates that USPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USPX	BTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.89%	2.92%	+1.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.06%	7.35%	+2.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.74%	9.98%	+2.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.28%	10.91%	+5.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.96%	10.91%	+5.05%

USPX vs. BTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

USPX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than BTR's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

USPX vs. BTR - Dividend Comparison

USPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than BTR's 1.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BTR Beacon Tactical Risk ETF	1.19%	1.29%	0.87%	0.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
USPX Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF	0.83%	1.07%	1.23%	1.35%	2.21%	2.40%	2.51%	3.07%	2.91%	2.60%	4.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USPX and BTR in my portfolio?

USPX and BTR have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USPX or BTR?

USPX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to BTR (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USPX dropped -31.21% vs BTR's -16.67%.

Which ETF is better, USPX or BTR?

On 3-year performance, USPX leads with 20.72% vs 4.25% for BTR. On fees, USPX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BTR has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, USPX or BTR?

Over the 3-year period, USPX has performed better with a 20.72% return vs 4.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, USPX or BTR?

USPX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for BTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, USPX or BTR?

BTR has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.83% for USPX.

What is the main difference between USPX and BTR?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and American Beacon. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for USPX and 1.10% for BTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.