PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USOY vs. LQTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USOY vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USOY achieves a 62.18% return, which is significantly higher than LQTI's 0.16% return.


USOY

1D
1.45%
1M
-3.43%
YTD
62.18%
6M
59.35%
1Y
57.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LQTI

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.41%
YTD
0.16%
6M
-0.04%
1Y
5.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USOY vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between USOY and LQTI is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025

-0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USOY vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USOY
USOY Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
USOY Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
USOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
USOY Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

LQTI
LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USOY vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USOYLQTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.19

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.03

1.68

+2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.74

5.15

+2.60

USOY vs. LQTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USOY Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is higher than the LQTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USOY and LQTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USOYLQTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

1.12

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.88

+0.11

Drawdowns

USOY vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USOY drawdown since its inception was -17.46%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USOY and LQTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USOYLQTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.46%

-3.41%

-14.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.29%

-3.41%

-10.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.11%

-1.44%

-3.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.47%

-0.88%

-5.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.42%

1.11%

+6.31%

Volatility

USOY vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY) has a higher volatility of 11.62% compared to FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) at 1.65%. This indicates that USOY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USOYLQTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.62%

1.65%

+9.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.18%

4.02%

+23.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.44%

5.10%

+25.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.13%

5.97%

+20.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.13%

5.97%

+20.16%

USOY vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

USOY has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

USOY vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

USOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 54.16%, more than LQTI's 9.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
LQTI
FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF
9.11%7.01%0.00%
USOY
Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF
54.16%104.32%48.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


USOY and LQTI have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USOY has higher volatility (11.62%) compared to LQTI (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USOY dropped -17.46% vs LQTI's -3.41%.

On 1-year performance, USOY leads with 57.29% vs 5.69% for LQTI. On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, LQTI has been the lower-risk option at 1.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, USOY has performed better with a 57.29% return vs 5.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.22% for USOY.

USOY has the higher dividend yield at 54.16%, compared with 9.11% for LQTI.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 1.22% for USOY and 0.65% for LQTI.

USOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USOY and LQTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer