PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USNQX vs. FOCKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USNQX vs. FOCKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USNQX achieves a 21.19% return, which is significantly lower than FOCKX's 28.33% return. Over the past 10 years, USNQX has underperformed FOCKX with an annualized return of 21.64%, while FOCKX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.80% annualized return.


USNQX

1D
-0.29%
1M
9.17%
YTD
21.19%
6M
19.57%
1Y
41.10%
3Y*
28.54%
5Y*
17.67%
10Y*
21.64%

FOCKX

1D
0.53%
1M
9.68%
YTD
28.33%
6M
29.20%
1Y
61.84%
3Y*
35.16%
5Y*
19.37%
10Y*
22.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USNQX vs. FOCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USNQX
USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund
21.19%20.52%25.42%54.46%-32.71%26.82%48.31%38.86%-0.43%32.30%
FOCKX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K
28.33%22.28%38.91%42.92%-32.07%25.06%46.83%39.36%-3.18%38.78%

Correlation

The correlation between USNQX and FOCKX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2008

0.95

The correlation between USNQX and FOCKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USNQX vs. FOCKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USNQX
USNQX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
USNQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USNQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
USNQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
USNQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
USNQX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FOCKX
FOCKX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FOCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FOCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USNQX vs. FOCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USNQXFOCKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.59

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

5.63

-2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.21

24.93

-11.72

USNQX vs. FOCKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USNQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the FOCKX Sharpe Ratio of 3.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USNQX and FOCKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USNQXFOCKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

3.57

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.86

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

1.02

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.74

-0.37

Drawdowns

USNQX vs. FOCKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USNQX drawdown since its inception was -76.24%, which is greater than FOCKX's maximum drawdown of -53.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USNQX and FOCKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USNQXFOCKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.24%

-53.33%

-22.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.07%

-11.28%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.88%

-24.83%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.95%

-36.97%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.95%

-36.97%

+0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

0.00%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.75%

-8.38%

-18.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

2.54%

+0.61%

Volatility

USNQX vs. FOCKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX) is 4.53%, while Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that USNQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USNQXFOCKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

5.38%

-0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.19%

13.94%

-1.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.09%

17.78%

-1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.90%

22.68%

+0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.66%

22.45%

+0.21%

USNQX vs. FOCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USNQX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than FOCKX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

USNQX vs. FOCKX - Dividend Comparison

USNQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than FOCKX's 5.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOCKX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K
5.89%7.56%16.42%0.09%3.97%11.34%6.18%7.49%7.81%4.85%3.25%5.42%
USNQX
USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund
2.49%3.01%2.19%2.60%4.13%4.48%1.53%0.88%0.69%1.97%0.50%2.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, USNQX and FOCKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FOCKX has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to USNQX (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USNQX dropped -76.24% vs FOCKX's -53.33%.

FOCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.57 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USNQX and FOCKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer