USNQX vs. FDGFX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

USNQX (USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund) and FDGFX (Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - USNQX is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index, while FDGFX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. USNQX is passively managed, while FDGFX is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, USNQX returned 21.43%/yr vs 13.99%/yr for FDGFX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. USNQX charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for FDGFX.

Performance

USNQX vs. FDGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX) and Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USNQX achieves a 16.78% return, which is significantly higher than FDGFX's 14.28% return. Over the past 10 years, USNQX has outperformed FDGFX with an annualized return of 21.43%, while FDGFX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.99% annualized return.

USNQX

• 1D: 3.29%
• 1M: -0.39%
• YTD: 16.78%
• 6M: 17.02%
• 1Y: 36.47%
• 3Y*: 26.28%
• 5Y*: 16.43%
• 10Y*: 21.43%

FDGFX

• 1D: 2.23%
• 1M: -2.45%
• YTD: 14.28%
• 6M: 15.02%
• 1Y: 34.97%
• 3Y*: 25.84%
• 5Y*: 15.16%
• 10Y*: 13.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USNQX vs. FDGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
USNQX USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund	16.78%	20.52%	25.42%	54.46%	-32.71%	26.82%	48.31%	38.86%	-0.43%	32.30%
FDGFX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund	14.28%	22.48%	27.58%	17.86%	-11.61%	27.96%	2.20%	28.75%	-7.23%	18.05%

Correlation

The correlation between USNQX and FDGFX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2000	0.81

The correlation between USNQX and FDGFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (10 years) to 0.88 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

USNQX vs. FDGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USNQX

USNQX Risk / Return Rank: 72
USNQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
USNQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
USNQX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
USNQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
USNQX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

FDGFX

FDGFX Risk / Return Rank: 84
FDGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FDGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FDGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
FDGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
FDGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USNQX vs. FDGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX) and Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USNQX	FDGFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	2.38	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	3.15	-0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.42	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	3.34	-0.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.87	14.65	-3.78

USNQX vs. FDGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USNQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the FDGFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USNQX and FDGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

USNQX vs. FDGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USNQX drawdown since its inception was -76.24%, which is greater than FDGFX's maximum drawdown of -60.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USNQX and FDGFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	USNQX	FDGFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.24%	-60.77%	-15.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.07%	-10.16%	-1.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.88%	-21.37%	-1.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.95%	-21.37%	-15.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.95%	-41.29%	+4.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.92%	-2.82%	-1.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.73%	-7.52%	-19.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.23%	2.31%	+0.92%

Volatility

USNQX vs. FDGFX - Volatility Comparison

USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX) has a higher volatility of 7.55% compared to Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) at 5.75%. This indicates that USNQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USNQX	FDGFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.55%	5.75%	+1.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.84%	11.56%	+2.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.30%	14.24%	+3.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.06%	16.71%	+6.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.74%	19.26%	+3.48%

USNQX vs. FDGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USNQX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than FDGFX's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

USNQX vs. FDGFX - Dividend Comparison

USNQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than FDGFX's 8.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDGFX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund	8.35%	9.35%	9.81%	3.48%	11.46%	7.81%	1.89%	4.84%	22.93%	15.35%	1.58%	8.44%
USNQX USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund	2.58%	3.01%	2.19%	2.60%	4.13%	4.48%	1.53%	0.88%	0.69%	1.97%	0.50%	2.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USNQX and FDGFX in my portfolio?

USNQX and FDGFX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USNQX or FDGFX?

USNQX has higher volatility (7.55%) compared to FDGFX (5.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USNQX dropped -76.24% vs FDGFX's -60.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDGFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.